AMD Ryzen 9 9950X vs Intel Core Ultra 7 265K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen 9 9950X compared with Core Ultra 7 265K
AMDRyzen 9 9950XIntelCore Ultra 7 265K
Overview
ReleasedAugust 2024October 2024
Cores and clocks
Cores1620 (8 performance, 12 efficiency) (better)
Threads32 (better)20
Base clock4.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock5.7 GHz (better)5.5 GHz
L3 cache64 MB (better)30 MB
Cores16 Zen 5 cores with simultaneous multithreading; codename Granite Ridge AM5; 3 dies in the package8 Performance-cores and 12 Efficient-cores, no Hyper-Threading; codename Arrow Lake
ClocksPrecision Boost 2; Precision Boost Overdrive and Curve Optimizer supportedP-core base 3.9 GHz, max turbo 5.4 GHz; E-core base 3.3 GHz, max turbo 4.6 GHz; Turbo Boost Max 3.0 5.5 GHz
CacheL1 1280 KB, L2 16 MB, L3 64 MB30 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 36 MB L2
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsYesYes
GraphicsAMD Radeon Graphics, 2 graphics cores at 2200 MHz; USB-C DisplayPort Alt ModeIntel Graphics, 4 Xe-cores, up to 2 GHz; outputs eDP1.4b, DP 2.1 UHBR20, HDMI 2.1 FRL; up to 4 displays; H.264, HEVC and AV1 encode and decode
AI engine–Intel AI Boost NPU, 13 TOPS (INT8); 33 TOPS for the whole processor
Platform
SocketAM5LGA1851
Base power170 W125 W
Maximum power–250 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNo–
Memory supportDDR5, 2 channels, up to 256 GB (UDIMM); DDR5-5600 with 2 modules, DDR5-3600 with 4; ECC with motherboard supportUp to DDR5 6400 MT/s; 2 channels, up to 256 GB; ECC supported
PCIePCIe 5.0; 28 lanes (24 usable); native USB: 4 × USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps), 1 × USB 2.0PCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 24 lanes (Up to 1x16+2x4, 2x8+2x4, 1x8+4x4); DMI 4 x8; Thunderbolt 4 built in
ChipsetsA620, X670E, X670, B650E, B650, X870E, X870, B840, B850–
ProcessTSMC 4nm FinFET (CPU cores), TSMC 6nm FinFET (I/O die)TSMC N3B (CPU)
CoolerNot included; Liquid cooler recommended for optimal performance; Tjmax 95°Cmax operating temperature 105 °C; thermal specification PCG 2020A

More comparisons