AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Intel Core i9-9820X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compared with Core i9-9820X
AMDRyzen Threadripper 2920XIntelCore i9-9820X
Overview
ReleasedOctober 20182018
Cores and clocks
Cores12 (better)10
Threads24 (better)20
Base clock3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock4.3 GHz (better)4.2 GHz
L3 cache32 MB (better)16.5 MB
CoresColfax; Zen+ architecture; boxed product ID YD292XA8AFWOF. X399 motherboards may require a BIOS update. AMD's October launch release confirms availability on 29 October 2018; its support page gives October 2018.Skylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksPrecision Boost 2, XFR2 and Precision Boost Overdrive supportedTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.20 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.10 GHz. Intel’s October 2018 announcement planned November availability. Ark’s contemporary exact-model report confirms Japanese retail sale on 14 December 2018, but earlier worldwide sale was not established; year precision is retained.
CacheL1 1152 KB; L2 6 MB16.5 MB Intel Smart Cache; L3 designation confirmed by the exact Newegg listing.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA2066
Base power180 W165 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2933 MT/sUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 processor lanes, 72 lanes across the processor and X399 platform44 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X299; LGA2066.
Process12 nm14 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 92°C.

More comparisons