AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Intel Core i9-9900K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compared with Core i9-9900K
AMDRyzen Threadripper 2920XIntelCore i9-9900K
Overview
ReleasedOctober 2018October 2018
Cores and clocks
Cores12 (better)8
Threads24 (better)16
Base clock3.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock4.3 GHz5 GHz (better)
L3 cache32 MB (better)16 MB
CoresColfax; Zen+ architecture; boxed product ID YD292XA8AFWOF. X399 motherboards may require a BIOS update. AMD's October launch release confirms availability on 29 October 2018; its support page gives October 2018.8 cores and 16 threads; Coffee Lake architecture; multiplier unlocked. Intel’s 19 October 2018 public news notice states that the processors ship that day; the 8 October announcement opened preorders.
ClocksPrecision Boost 2, XFR2 and Precision Boost Overdrive supported3.6 GHz base; up to 5.0 GHz Intel Turbo Boost 2.0.
CacheL1 1152 KB; L2 6 MB–
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoYes
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredIntel UHD Graphics 630; 350 MHz base, up to 1.2 GHz; Quick Sync Video; up to three displays.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA1151
Base power180 W95 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2933 MT/sUp to 128 GB on the current Intel specification page; two channels; DDR4-2666; 41.6 GB/s; ECC not supported.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 processor lanes, 72 lanes across the processor and X399 platformPCIe 3.0; 16 CPU lanes: 1 × 16, 2 × 8 or 1 × 8 + 2 × 4. This excludes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel 300-series motherboards, with appropriate BIOS support; Z390 was introduced alongside this generation.
Process12 nm14 nm; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 100°C maximum junction temperature.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CNo fan or heatsink included with the boxed processor (Intel specifications).

More comparisons