Apple EarPods (USB-C) vs Sennheiser IE 200

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

EarPods (USB-C) compared with IE 200
AppleEarPods (USB-C)SennheiserIE 200
Overview
ReleasedSeptember 2023January 2023
Sound
TypeOpen-earIn-ear
Noise cancellingNoNo
Driver size–7 mm
Impedance–16 ohms
Bluetooth codecsNone (wired)None (wired)
Drivers–7 mm TrueResponse extra wide band (XWB) dynamic driver, diffuse-field equalised; 6 – 20,000 Hz; 119 dB SPL (1 kHz, 1 Vrms) on the product page, 124 dB in the quick guide; THD < 0.08% (1 kHz, 94 dB); impedance 16 ohms without cable, 18 ohms with cable
Lossless over USB-CYes–
Audio featuresLossless audio over USB-C (TechRadar); Apple does not publish supported bit depths or sample rates on its product page–
Battery
Listening time (maker's claim)No battery (wired)No battery (wired)
Design
Weight (each earbud)–4 g
Headphone cableNoYes
ControlsInline remote for volume, music and video playback, and answering or ending calls–
MicrophonesInline microphone–
Fit and ear tipsNon-sealing earbuds with a fixed shape and no ear tipsIn-ear, closed; about 26 dB attenuation; TPU-encased ear hooks; silicone and memory-foam tips (S, M, L) with two mounting positions for more or less bass
Water resistance detailApple states protection from sweat and water but does not publish an IP rating–
Works withUSB-C Macs with macOS Monterey 12.6 or later; USB-C iPads with iPadOS 16.4 or later; USB-C iPhones with iOS 17 or laterDetachable 1.2 m braided OFC cable, para-aramid reinforced, with gold-plated MMCX connectors and angled 3.5 mm plug
ColoursWhite–
In the boxEarPods with USB-C ConnectorIE 200 earphones, braided cable with MMCX connectors and 3.5 mm plug, silicone and memory-foam tips (S, M, L), pouch, safety guide

More comparisons