Apple Macintosh PowerBook 3400c vs Apple PowerBook G4 (12-inch, 1.5GHz)

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Macintosh PowerBook 3400c compared with PowerBook G4 (12-inch, 1.5GHz)
AppleMacintosh PowerBook 3400cApplePowerBook G4 (12-inch, 1.5GHz)
Overview
ReleasedFebruary 19972005
Display
Screen size12.1″12.1″
Resolution800 × 6001024 × 768 (better)
TouchscreenNoNo
Display type12.1-inch active-matrix TFT colour LCD, displaying 32,768 colours at 800 × 60012.1-inch TFT XGA active-matrix display; panel technology and refresh unpublished.
Performance
ProcessorPowerPC 603e 180 MHz (PowerBook 3400c), PowerPC 603e 200 MHz (PowerBook 3400c) or PowerPC 603e 240 MHz (PowerBook 3400c)PowerPC G4 1.5 GHz (PowerBook 12-inch 2005)
CPU cores11
Graphics–NVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 (64 MB DDR)
Memory16 MB512 MB or 1.25 GB (better)
Storage1.3 GB to 3 GB60 GB to 100 GB (better)
CPUPowerPC 603e at 180, 200 or 240 MHz; 40 MHz bus, 32 KB L1 cache and 256 KB L2 cache1.5 GHz PowerPC G4, 512 KB on-chip L2 and 167 MHz system bus. Exact silicon supplier omitted.
GPUChips and Technologies CT65550 PCI video controller, named by Apple in its Japanese series specificationNVIDIA GeForce FX Go5200 with 64 MB DDR video memory and AGP 4×.
Memory type16 MB EDO RAM on the logic board, expandable to 144 MB with a memory card512 MB PC2700 DDR333 standard; one SO-DIMM slot, maximum 1.25 GB.
Storage type1.3 GB ATA hard drive on the 180 MHz model; 2 GB on the 200 MHz and 3 GB on the 240 MHz Japanese configurations. Swappable 1.4 MB floppy and CD-ROM modules; Apple lists 6× CD for the 180 MHz model and 12× for the 200/240 MHz Japanese models.5400 rpm Ultra ATA/100 hard drive with Sudden Motion Sensor. Combo base60GB; SuperDrive base80GB; 100GB build-to-order on either. 8× DVD±RW/CD-RW SuperDrive; optical-drive differences retained in details.
Battery and size
Battery life (maker's claim)Up to 4 hoursUp to 5 hours
Battery capacity32 Wh50 Wh (better)
Weight3.2 kg2.1 kg (better)
Thickness65.6 mm–
Width × depth293 × 239.5 mm–
Battery life detail32 Wh lithium-ion battery; Apple claimed two to four hours for the Japanese 200/240 MHz series. The Japanese 3.2 kg weight is with the floppy module; Apple lists 3.3 kg with CD-ROM.50 Wh lithium-ion, up to five hours. Published reference weight 2.1 kg with battery and optical drive; varies by configuration/manufacturing. Published dimensions: height 3.0 cm, width 27.7 cm, depth 21.9 cm.
Charger–45 W power adapter
Materials–Aluminium enclosure
Connections
Ports–2 × USB-A, Ethernet, headphone jack
Wi-Fi–AirPort Extreme 802.11g/b
Bluetooth–2.0 + EDR
Operating systemmacOSmacOS
Port detailADB, RS-422 serial/LocalTalk, HDI-30 SCSI, HDI-15 external video, infrared, stereo audio input/output and two Type II PC Card slots or one Type III. Built-in 10Base-T Ethernet and 33.6 Kbps modem on the 200/240 MHz Japanese configurations; Ethernet optional on the 180 MHz support specification.Two USB 2.0 ports, FireWire 400, 10/100 Ethernet, 56K V.92 modem, mini-DVI, audio input and headphone output. Mini-DVI-to-DVI and mini-DVI-to-VGA adapters included; television adapter separate.
External displaysHDI-15 external display output; Apple lists 8-bit colour to a 21-inch monitor and 32,768 colours in SVGA mode on smaller monitorsDual display and mirroring; external resolution up to 2048 × 1536.
Keyboard–Full-size keyboard with embedded numeric keypad
TrackpadBuilt-in solid-state trackpadTwo-finger scrolling/panning, tap, double-tap and drag support
SpeakersFour built-in speakers and an omnidirectional microphoneStereo speakers with midrange-enhancing third speaker
Microphones–Internal omnidirectional microphone
In the boxApple's Japanese 200/240 MHz configurations included floppy and 12× CD-ROM modules, lithium-ion battery, power adapter and Mac OS 7.6Apple announced 31 January 2005 with availability planned later that week. Actual first on-sale month unestablished after a bounded search; year precision retained. Launch Mac OS X 10.3 Panther and iLife ’05; later units shipped Tiger.

More comparisons