Beurer BM 53 vs Omron M6 Comfort AFib
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| BeurerBM 53 | OmronM6 Comfort AFib | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | September 2024 |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Clinically validated | – | Yes |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| AFib detection or ECG | Yes | Yes |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement during deflation; first on-sale date not established | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement; HEM-7380-E, distinct from older M6 Comfort generations |
| Accuracy | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this specification is distinct from clinical validation | Maker's pressure accuracy ±3 mmHg and pulse accuracy ±5% of displayed reading; systolic range 60–260 mmHg, diastolic 40–215 mmHg and pulse 40–180 beats/minute |
| Clinical validation | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 and suitability during pregnancy; exact independent registry confirmation was not established | STRIDE BP approves HEM-7380-E as equivalent to Omron BP760N (HEM-7320-Z), whose blood-pressure studies cover adults, type 2 diabetes and pregnancy/preeclampsia; equivalent-device approval is distinct from a direct test of this exact monitor and from AFib algorithm validation |
| Features | Advanced arrhythmia indication including possible atrial fibrillation, automatic triple measurement, resting indicator, cuff fit check, classification scale and automatic switch-off | Screens pulse waves for possible AFib during a routine measurement, rather than recording an ECG or making a diagnosis; irregular heartbeat, body movement and cuff-wrap indicators. TruRead averages three readings with a selectable interval; morning/evening weekly averages |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–42 cm | 22–42 cm |
| Cuff | Supplied upper-arm cuff | HEM-FL31 preformed Intelli Wrap Cuff; approximately 145 × 532 mm, 750 mm air tube and 163 g |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Users | 2 | 2 |
| Readings stored | 100 per user | 100 per user |
| Bluetooth and app | No | No |
| Memory | 100 readings per user; average of all saved readings and morning/evening readings from the last seven days | Up to 100 readings per user for two users; guest measurements are not saved; previous/current readings shown together |
| App | Scan & Save in beurer HealthManager Pro uses a smartphone camera to record the display; no Bluetooth connection | No Bluetooth or OMRON connect support |
| Power | Four 1.5 V AAA batteries or optional DC 5 V, 1 A mains adaptor; maker claims approximately 300 measurements depending on pressure | Four AA batteries included; optional HHP-CM01 or HHP-BFH01 AC adapter. Approximately 700 measurements with new alkaline batteries; fewer in three-reading TruRead mode |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Illuminated LCD, 8.0 × 7.4 cm, with black digits on a white background | Digital LCD with previous-reading comparison |
| Size | 14.00 × 9.40 × 4.60 cm (L × W × H), current maker product page | Approximately 191 × 85 × 117 mm (W × H × L); monitor approximately 440 g without batteries |
| In the box | Monitor, 22–42 cm cuff, four AAA batteries and storage bag; maker product page also lists a blood pressure record | Monitor, Intelli Wrap Cuff, four AA batteries, instruction manuals 1/2 and storage case |
More comparisons
- Omron M3 Comfort AFib vs Omron M6 Comfort AFib
- Omron M4 Connect AFib vs Omron M6 Comfort AFib
- Omron M6 Comfort AFib vs Omron M7 Intelli IT AFib
- A&D Medical UA-611Plus vs Omron M6 Comfort AFib
- Microlife BP A150-30 AFIB vs Omron M6 Comfort AFib
- Beurer BM 53 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 53
- Beurer BM 53 vs Beurer BM 54
- Beurer BM 53 vs Rossmax AC1000f
- A&D Medical UA-611Plus vs Beurer BM 53
- Beurer BM 53 vs Microlife BP A150-30 AFIB
- Beurer BM 53 vs Microlife BP A150 AFIB
- Beurer BM 53 vs Microlife BP A200 AFIB
- Beurer BM 53 vs Microlife BP A6 PC
- Beurer BM 53 vs Microlife BP A7 Touch
- Beurer BM 53 vs Microlife BP B3 AFIB

