Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i5-14600K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Core i5-10400F compared with Core i5-14600K
IntelCore i5-10400FIntelCore i5-14600K
Overview
ReleasedMay 2020October 2023
Cores and clocks
Cores614 (6 performance, 8 efficiency) (better)
Threads1220 (better)
Base clock2.9 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock4.3 GHz5.3 GHz (better)
L3 cache12 MB24 MB (better)
CoresHyper-Threading supported; Intel Turbo Boost 2.0 supported, without Turbo Boost Max 3.0 or Thermal Velocity Boost.6 Performance-cores and 8 Efficient-cores, with Hyper-Threading; codename Raptor Lake
ClocksLocked CPU multiplier (Intel support). ComputerBase reports an Intel-confirmed 134 W PL2 limit for 28 seconds; the current Intel specification page publishes TDP only.P-core base 3.5 GHz, max turbo 5.3 GHz; E-core base 2.6 GHz, max turbo 4 GHz
Cache–24 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 20 MB L2
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoYes
GraphicsNo integrated graphics; a separate graphics card is required (Intel support).Intel UHD Graphics 770, 32 execution units, up to 1.55 GHz; outputs eDP 1.4b, DP 1.4a, HDMI 2.1; up to 4 displays
Platform
SocketLGA1200LGA1700
Base power65 W125 W
Maximum power–181 W
UnlockedNoYes
Memory supportUp to 128 GB; two channels; DDR4-2666; 41.6 GB/s maximum bandwidth; ECC not supported.Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s or up to DDR4 3200 MT/s; 2 channels, up to 192 GB; ECC supported
PCIePCIe 3.0; 16 CPU lanes, configured as 1×16, 2×8 or 1×8+2×4.PCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 20 lanes (Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4); DMI 4.0 x8
Chipsets–Intel 600 and 700 series
Process14 nm; Comet Lake; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 100°C maximum junction temperature. ComputerBase identifies G1 six-core-die and Q0 ten-core-die versions with the same published core, cache and clock specifications; its G1 sample uses thermal paste under the heat spreader, while Q0 is soldered.Intel 7
Cooler–max operating temperature 100 °C; thermal specification PCG 2020A

More comparisons