Intel Core i5-10400F vs Intel Core i7-14700K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Core i5-10400F compared with Core i7-14700K
IntelCore i5-10400FIntelCore i7-14700K
Overview
ReleasedMay 2020October 2023
Cores and clocks
Cores620 (8 performance, 12 efficiency) (better)
Threads1228 (better)
Base clock2.9 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock4.3 GHz5.6 GHz (better)
L3 cache12 MB33 MB (better)
CoresHyper-Threading supported; Intel Turbo Boost 2.0 supported, without Turbo Boost Max 3.0 or Thermal Velocity Boost.8 Performance-cores and 12 Efficient-cores, with Hyper-Threading; codename Raptor Lake
ClocksLocked CPU multiplier (Intel support). ComputerBase reports an Intel-confirmed 134 W PL2 limit for 28 seconds; the current Intel specification page publishes TDP only.P-core base 3.4 GHz, max turbo 5.5 GHz; E-core base 2.5 GHz, max turbo 4.3 GHz; Turbo Boost Max 3.0 5.6 GHz
Cache–33 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 28 MB L2
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoYes
GraphicsNo integrated graphics; a separate graphics card is required (Intel support).Intel UHD Graphics 770, 32 execution units, up to 1.6 GHz; outputs eDP 1.4b, DP 1.4a, HDMI 2.1; up to 4 displays
Platform
SocketLGA1200LGA1700
Base power65 W125 W
Maximum power–253 W
UnlockedNoYes
Memory supportUp to 128 GB; two channels; DDR4-2666; 41.6 GB/s maximum bandwidth; ECC not supported.Up to DDR5 5600 MT/s or up to DDR4 3200 MT/s; 2 channels, up to 192 GB; ECC supported
PCIePCIe 3.0; 16 CPU lanes, configured as 1×16, 2×8 or 1×8+2×4.PCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 20 lanes (Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4); DMI 4.0 x8
Chipsets–Intel 600 and 700 series
Process14 nm; Comet Lake; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 100°C maximum junction temperature. ComputerBase identifies G1 six-core-die and Q0 ten-core-die versions with the same published core, cache and clock specifications; its G1 sample uses thermal paste under the heat spreader, while Q0 is soldered.Intel 7
Cooler–max operating temperature 100 °C; thermal specification PCG 2020A

More comparisons