Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro+
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| SamsungGalaxy Note20 Ultra | vivoX50 Pro+ | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | August 2020 | July 2020 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.9″ | 6.56″ |
| Resolution | 3088 × 1440 (better) | 2376 × 1080 |
| Sharpness | 494 pixels per inch (better) | 398 pixels per inch |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | – | 1,300 nits |
| Display type | 6.9-inch edge Quad HD+ Dynamic AMOLED 2X Infinity-O Display (3,088 × 1,440), HDR10+ certified, 120 Hz; 6.8 inches with rounded corners | Curved AMOLED; China V2011A hardware and configurations throughout |
| Brightness detail | – | 1300 nits local peak, maker |
| Display features | – | 240 Hz touch sampling, P3 gamut, 16 million colours, HDR10/HDR10+, 6,000,000:1 contrast and 92.6% screen-to-body ratio |
| Pixel density | 496 ppi | – |
| Screen protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus front and back | – |
| Performance | ||
| Chip | Exynos 990 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Memory | 12 GB | 8 GB – 12 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB, 512 GB (better) | 128 GB, 256 GB |
| CPU | 64-bit octa-core (7 nm), 2.73 GHz + 2.5 GHz + 2 GHz; 12 GB of LPDDR5 RAM (5G) | Snapdragon 865, 64-bit octa-core, 7 nm; 1×2.84 GHz, 3×2.42 GHz and 4×1.8 GHz; X55 modem |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MP11 | Adreno 650 |
| Storage type | 256 GB (221.6 GB available) or 512 GB; microSD card slot up to 1 TB | Quad-channel LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage; no microSD slot, TechAdvisor |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | 108 MP (better) | 50 MP |
| Ultra wide camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Telephoto camera | 12 MP | 13 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP (better) |
| Main camera | 108 MP wide-angle, PDAF, OIS, F1.8, 79°, 0.8 µm; laser AF sensor | 50 MP f/1.85 GN1, 1/1.3-inch sensor, OIS/EIS, closed-loop motor and seven-element lens; 2.4 μm combined pixels and 11536×8690 high-resolution mode; conventional OIS rather than the X50 Pro's gimbal |
| Ultra wide camera | 12 MP, F2.2, 120°, 1.4 µm | 13 MP f/2.2, 120° field of view or 108° after distortion correction; 2.5 cm macro focus |
| Telephoto camera | 12 MP, F3.0, 20°, 1.0 µm, 5x optical zoom | 13 MP f/3.0 periscope with 5× optical zoom and OIS/EIS |
| Second telephoto camera | – | 32 MP f/2.08 portrait camera, 50 mm equivalent lens |
| Front camera | 10 MP Dual Pixel AF, F2.2, 80°, 1.22 µm | 32 MP f/2.45 |
| Zoom | 5x optical zoom; digital zoom up to 50x | 60× Super Zoom, maker; SlashGear's 50× wording differs |
| Video recording | 8K (7,680 × 4,320) at 24 fps, including 21:9 | 8K, 4K, 1080p and 720p recording; 1080p slow motion; OIS/EIS, video portrait, Autozoom, sound tracking and one-click vlog with speech captions |
| Camera features | – | Main/periscope autofocus; rear flash; Night, Astro, Supermoon, Pro Sports, Panorama, Live Photo, high-resolution and document modes; object tracking continues after up to three seconds out of frame |
| Battery and charging | ||
| Battery | 4,500 mAh (better) | 4,350 mAh |
| Wired charging | – | Up to 44 W |
| Video playback (maker's claim) | Up to 19 hours | – |
| Wireless charging | Yes (wattage not published) | None |
| Battery life detail | 4,500 mAh typical; video playback up to 19 hours; internet use up to 15 hours (LTE) or 16 hours (Wi-Fi); talk time up to 24 hours (4G) | 4350 mAh typical lithium battery; maker laboratory maxima of 312 hours 4G standby and 16.7 hours VoLTE calling. TechAdvisor's closing 4315 mAh specification conflicts with its own 4350 mAh body and maker sheet |
| Wired charging | 25 W Super Fast Charging | 44 W FlashCharge; maker claims 62% charge in 30 minutes with supplied charger, starting at 1%, screen off, at 25°C ±1°C |
| Wireless charging | 15 W Fast Wireless Charging 2.0 | No wireless charging, TechAdvisor |
| Charges other devices | Wireless PowerShare; 4.5 W (Samsung Lithuania) | OTG reverse charging supported |
| Design | ||
| Type | Standard | Standard |
| Weight | 208 g | 192.2 g (better) |
| Thickness | 8.1 mm (better) | 8.83 mm |
| Height × width | 164.8 × 77.2 mm | 158.5 × 73 mm |
| Water and dust resistance | IP68 | – |
| Stylus | Yes | – |
| Materials | Gorilla Glass Victus front and back with a metal frame | Glass-back Gravity finish is 192.2 g and 8.83 mm thick; Camel faux-leather finish is 191.1 g and 9.48 mm thick |
| Colours | Mystic Bronze, Mystic Black, Mystic White | Gravity (silver-blue) and Camel |
| Water resistance detail | IP68 | – |
| Biometrics | Fingerprint sensor, face recognition | In-display fingerprint scanning and Face Wake |
| Sensors | – | Accelerometer, ambient light, proximity, physical gyroscope, compass, laser autofocus and colour-temperature sensors |
| Speakers | – | CS43131 independent Hi-Res audio chip; maker specifies 384 kHz/32-bit, up to 130 dB dynamic range and 2 Vrms output |
| Microphones | – | Three microphones at bottom, top and beside rear cameras for sound tracking |
| Software | ||
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Software at launch | Android 10 | Android 10 with Funtouch OS 10.5; China software has no Google Play preinstalled, TechAdvisor and SlashGear; no UK sale or configuration asserted |
| AI features | – | Jovi voice, document recognition and voice-to-subtitle processing |
| Connectivity | ||
| Mobile network | 5G (NSA, SA), Sub6; LTE Cat 20, up to 7CA, up to 2.0 Gbps down and 200 Mbps up | China SA/NSA 5G; GSM 850/900/1800/1900; CDMA BC0; WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8; LTE TDD B34/38/39/40/41 and FDD B1/2/3/4/7/8/12/17/26 (including B5/18/19); 5G n1/n3/n41/n77/n78/n79 |
| SIM | – | Dual nano-SIM with dual standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 (802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax), 2.4 and 5 GHz, HE80, MIMO, 1024-QAM | 2.4 GHz, 5.1 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands, maker |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1; SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD and LDAC |
| Ultra Wideband | Yes | – |
| NFC | Yes | Supported, including China vivo Wallet services |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB-C with OTG and audio through USB-C |
| Positioning | – | BeiDou, GPS, GLONASS and Galileo |
More comparisons
- vivo X300 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X300 FE vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X300 vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X300 Pro vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X200 FE vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X200 vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X200 Pro vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X100 Pro vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X50 Pro+ vs vivo X80 Pro
- vivo X50 Pro+ vs vivo X70 Pro+
- Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra vs Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra
- vivo X50 Pro+ vs vivo X60 Pro+
- Samsung Galaxy Note20 vs Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
- OPPO Find X2 Pro vs Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra
- Samsung Galaxy Note10 vs Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra

