vivo X50 Pro+ vs Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| vivoX50 Pro+ | XiaomiMi 10 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | July 2020 | August 2020 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.56″ | 6.67″ |
| Resolution | 2376 × 1080 (better) | 2340 × 1080 |
| Sharpness | 398 pixels per inch (better) | 386 pixels per inch |
| Panel | OLED | OLED |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 1,300 nits (better) | 1,120 nits |
| Display type | Curved AMOLED; China V2011A hardware and configurations throughout | 10-bit AMOLED with Gorilla Glass 5. |
| Brightness detail | 1300 nits local peak, maker | 800 nits in high-brightness mode and 1,120 nits peak. |
| Display features | 240 Hz touch sampling, P3 gamut, 16 million colours, HDR10/HDR10+, 6,000,000:1 contrast and 92.6% screen-to-body ratio | HDR10+ and 240 Hz touch sampling. |
| Performance | ||
| Chip | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 |
| Memory | 8 GB – 12 GB | 8 GB – 16 GB (better) |
| Storage | 128 GB, 256 GB | 128 GB, 256 GB, 512 GB (better) |
| CPU | Snapdragon 865, 64-bit octa-core, 7 nm; 1×2.84 GHz, 3×2.42 GHz and 4×1.8 GHz; X55 modem | Eight-core Kryo 585 CPU, up to 2.84 GHz; 7 nm FFP process. |
| GPU | Adreno 650 | Adreno 650, up to 587 MHz. |
| Storage type | Quad-channel LPDDR5 RAM and UFS 3.1 storage; no microSD slot, TechAdvisor | LPDDR5 and UFS 3.1; no microSD expansion (Notebookcheck). |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (better) | 48 MP |
| Ultra wide camera | 13 MP | 20 MP |
| Telephoto camera | 13 MP | 48 MP |
| Optical zoom | 5× | 5× |
| Front camera | 32 MP (better) | 20 MP |
| Main camera | 50 MP f/1.85 GN1, 1/1.3-inch sensor, OIS/EIS, closed-loop motor and seven-element lens; 2.4 μm combined pixels and 11536×8690 high-resolution mode; conventional OIS rather than the X50 Pro's gimbal | f/1.85, 1/1.32-inch sensor, optical stabilisation, eight-element lens and 2.4 µm pixels with four-pixel binning; dual native ISO Fusion HDR. |
| Ultra wide camera | 13 MP f/2.2, 120° field of view or 108° after distortion correction; 2.5 cm macro focus | f/2.2, 128° field of view and 12 mm equivalent focal length. |
| Telephoto camera | 13 MP f/3.0 periscope with 5× optical zoom and OIS/EIS | f/4.1, optical stabilisation and 120 mm equivalent focal length. The maker's footnote confirms 5× optical zoom; its headline 10× equivalent claim and 120× digital zoom are not optical ratios. |
| Second telephoto camera | 32 MP f/2.08 portrait camera, 50 mm equivalent lens | – |
| Front camera | 32 MP f/2.45 | – |
| Zoom | 60× Super Zoom, maker; SlashGear's 50× wording differs | – |
| Video recording | 8K, 4K, 1080p and 720p recording; 1080p slow motion; OIS/EIS, video portrait, Autozoom, sound tracking and one-click vlog with speech captions | Rear 8K at 24 fps, 4K at 30/60 fps, 1080p at 30/60 fps and 720p at 30 fps. Slow motion at 720p or 1080p at 120/240/960 fps. Maker's 8K frame rate takes precedence over Notebookcheck's conflicting 30 fps listing. |
| Front video | – | 1080p or 720p at 30 fps; 720p slow motion at 120 fps; electronic stabilisation. |
| Camera features | Main/periscope autofocus; rear flash; Night, Astro, Supermoon, Pro Sports, Panorama, Live Photo, high-resolution and document modes; object tracking continues after up to three seconds out of frame | Additional 12 MP f/2.0 portrait camera with 2× optical zoom, 50 mm equivalent focal length, 1.4 µm pixels and dual-pixel autofocus; laser autofocus sensor. |
| Battery and charging | ||
| Battery | 4,350 mAh | 4,500 mAh (better) |
| Wired charging | Up to 44 W | Up to 120 W (better) |
| Wireless charging | None | Up to 50 W (better) |
| Battery life detail | 4350 mAh typical lithium battery; maker laboratory maxima of 312 hours 4G standby and 16.7 hours VoLTE calling. TechAdvisor's closing 4315 mAh specification conflicts with its own 4350 mAh body and maker sheet | 4,500 mAh equivalent typical and 4,360 mAh equivalent minimum capacity; two 2,250 mAh typical cells in series. Non-removable graphene-based lithium-ion battery. |
| Wired charging | 44 W FlashCharge; maker claims 62% charge in 30 minutes with supplied charger, starting at 1%, screen off, at 25°C ±1°C | 120 W maximum; phone supports Quick Charge 5. Included 120 W adapter supports Quick Charge 4+ and USB Power Delivery 3.0 with backwards compatibility. |
| Wireless charging | No wireless charging, TechAdvisor | 50 W maximum wireless and 10 W reverse wireless charging. |
| Charges other devices | OTG reverse charging supported | – |
| Design | ||
| Type | Standard | Standard |
| Weight | 192.2 g (better) | 221.8 g |
| Thickness | 8.83 mm (better) | 9.45 mm |
| Height × width | 158.5 × 73 mm | 162.38 × 75.04 mm |
| Materials | Glass-back Gravity finish is 192.2 g and 8.83 mm thick; Camel faux-leather finish is 191.1 g and 9.48 mm thick | Glass front and back with metal frame. The maker explicitly says the ceramic-black version uses coated glass rather than a ceramic back. |
| Colours | Gravity (silver-blue) and Camel | Transparent edition, ceramic black and bright silver; translated from the maker's Chinese specification. |
| Biometrics | In-display fingerprint scanning and Face Wake | In-display fingerprint reader; face unlock (Notebookcheck). |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, ambient light, proximity, physical gyroscope, compass, laser autofocus and colour-temperature sensors | Infrared blaster, ultrasonic proximity, in-display ambient light, dual accelerometers, dual gyroscopes, compass, Hall sensor, barometer, rear colour-temperature sensor and laser autofocus. |
| Speakers | CS43131 independent Hi-Res audio chip; maker specifies 384 kHz/32-bit, up to 130 dB dynamic range and 2 Vrms output | Stereo speakers (Android Authority and Notebookcheck); Hi-Res Audio certification. |
| Microphones | Three microphones at bottom, top and beside rear cameras for sound tracking | – |
| Software | ||
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Software at launch | Android 10 with Funtouch OS 10.5; China software has no Google Play preinstalled, TechAdvisor and SlashGear; no UK sale or configuration asserted | MIUI 12 based on Android 10. China-market software; Notebookcheck's review uses modified Xiaomi.eu firmware. |
| In the box | – | 120 W charger, USB-C cable, USB-C audio adapter, case, SIM tool and documents. August 2020 is the conservative first-sale month from Gizchina's actual China sale report; an exact maker-confirmed day remains unverified. |
| AI features | Jovi voice, document recognition and voice-to-subtitle processing | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| Mobile network | China SA/NSA 5G; GSM 850/900/1800/1900; CDMA BC0; WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8; LTE TDD B34/38/39/40/41 and FDD B1/2/3/4/7/8/12/17/26 (including B5/18/19); 5G n1/n3/n41/n77/n78/n79 | China-market 5G SA/NSA and 4G. Published 5G bands n1/n3/n41/n78/n79; n1/n3 required an operator-dependent software update. Published LTE bands omit 20 and 28. |
| SIM | Dual nano-SIM with dual standby | Dual nano-SIM; main SIM supports 5G, secondary SIM 4G. VoLTE and simultaneous services depend on the operator. |
| Wi-Fi | 2.4 GHz, 5.1 GHz and 5.8 GHz bands, maker | Wi-Fi 6, 5 and 4; 2.4 and 5 GHz, 2×2 MIMO, Wi-Fi Direct and Miracast. |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.1; SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD and LDAC | Bluetooth 5.1 with AAC, LDAC and LHDC. |
| NFC | Supported, including China vivo Wallet services | Multifunction NFC with China-market Mi Pay, supported transport cards and access-card services. |
| USB | USB-C with OTG and audio through USB-C | USB-C with USB 2.0 data; no 3.5 mm socket (Notebookcheck). |
| Positioning | BeiDou, GPS, GLONASS and Galileo | – |
More comparisons
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 18 Pro
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 18 Pro Max
- vivo X300 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro+
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- vivo X300 FE vs vivo X50 Pro+
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 17
- vivo X300 vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X300 Pro vs vivo X50 Pro+
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 17 Pro
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 17 Pro Max
- vivo X200 FE vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro+
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- vivo X200 vs vivo X50 Pro+
- vivo X200 Pro vs vivo X50 Pro+
- Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 15

