Apple Pro Mouse (2000)

Apple

Pro Mouse (2000)

Released July 2000

Apple's one-button wired USB mouse that replaced the iMac's round ball mouse with optical tracking.

Model history · 2 models, 1998–2000
  1. 1998USB Mouse (1998)Compare
  2. 2000Pro Mouse (2000)
Shape
Standard
Buttons
1
DPI
–
Battery
–
Connects by
Cable
Weight
–

What reviewers say

Macworld and Ars Technica found the optical sensor much more accurate than Apple's ball mouse at ordinary speeds and liked the longer shape. Macworld found the cable too short and missed a second button and wheel; Ars reported tracking trouble during very fast movements.

From macworld.com and arstechnica.com

Tracking

Shape
Standard
Hand
Either hand
Sensor
Optical
Buttons
1
Sensor
Optical tracking without a mechanical ball or rollers; Apple did not publish a DPI figure in its announcement.
Scroll wheel
None.

Connections and battery

Connects by
Cable
Power
Cable
Works with
USB-equipped Macintosh computers; Apple listed Mac OS 9 for the new Pro Mouse and Pro Keyboard.

Design

Materials
Clear outer shell over a dark inner shell; the entire top surface is the button.
Colours
Black with a clear shell at launch.
In the box
Bundled with the iMac DV, DV+ and DV Special Edition available on 19 July 2000; sold separately from September.

Pros and cons

Pros

  • Optical tracking has no ball or rollers to clean
  • Entire top shell acts as a button with adjustable click force
  • Symmetrical shape can be used with either hand

Cons

  • One button and no scroll wheel
  • Requires a USB cable
  • Cable is short for use without a nearby USB port

Closest rivals

Model
ShapeButtonsDPIBatteryConnects byWeightReleased
Standard1–3 monthsBluetooth–Sept 2003
Compact1––Cable–Aug 1998
Standard1––Cable–1993

Previous model: USB Mouse (1998).

Sources

  1. apple.com/newsroom/2000/07/19Apple-Unveils-Optical-Mouse-and-New-Pro-Keyboard
  2. apple.com/newsroom/2000/07/19Apple-Introduces-New-iMacs-in-Stunning-New-Colors
  3. macworld.com/article/159716/mouse.html

Photo: mac-museum.com

Spot a mistake? Tell us