AMD Ryzen 5 2600 vs Intel Core i5-3570K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen 5 2600 compared with Core i5-3570K
AMDRyzen 5 2600IntelCore i5-3570K
Overview
ReleasedApril 2018April 2012
Cores and clocks
Cores6 (better)4
Threads12 (better)4
Base clock3.4 GHz3.4 GHz
Boost clock3.9 GHz (better)3.8 GHz
L3 cache16 MB (better)6 MB
CoresZen+; Pinnacle Ridge.Four cores without Hyper-Threading; Intel Turbo Boost 2.0 supported. Intel VT-x supported; VT-d is not supported on this model.
Clocks–Maximum turbo is a single-core frequency; sustained clocks and overclocking depend on motherboard support and cooling. Intel publishes TDP without a separate maximum turbo-power figure.
Cache576 KB L1; 3 MB L2.–
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoYes
GraphicsA separate graphics card is required.Intel HD Graphics 4000; 650 MHz base, up to 1.15 GHz; three displays; Quick Sync Video. Intel's launch information identifies DirectX 11 support; available outputs depend on the motherboard.
Platform
SocketAM4LGA1155
Base power65 W77 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxYes–
Memory supportDDR4; two channels; up to 2933 MT/s.Up to 32 GB; two channels; DDR3-1333/1600; 25.6 GB/s maximum bandwidth; ECC not supported.
PCIePCIe 3.0 x16, as listed by AMD.PCIe 3.0; configurations up to 1×16, 2×8 or 1×8+2×4, as listed by Intel. Motherboard support determines available slot configurations.
ChipsetsAMD's launch notice introduces X470 and specifies compatibility with existing 300-series motherboards following a BIOS update; check the motherboard CPU support list.–
Process12nm FinFET.22 nm; Ivy Bridge; 3D tri-gate transistors; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 67.4°C Tcase limit, not a junction-temperature limit.
CoolerWraith Stealth included with boxed and multipack processors; maximum operating temperature 95°C.LGA1155-compatible cooling required. Intel announced the quad-core family on 23 April 2012; Ars Technica's contemporaneous launch report quotes Newegg confirming retail sale on 29 April. The archived maker sale notice could not be read, so the day is supported by named secondary retail coverage.

More comparisons