AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Intel Core i9-12900K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X compared with Core i9-12900K
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950XIntelCore i9-12900K
Overview
ReleasedAugust 2017November 2021
Cores and clocks
Cores1616 (8 performance, 8 efficiency)
Threads32 (better)24
Base clock3.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock4 GHz5.2 GHz (better)
L3 cache32 MB (better)30 MB
CoresZen architecture; boxed product ID YD195XA8AEWOF. AMD's support page lists 31 July 2017, when pre-orders began; its press release confirms on-shelf availability on 10 August 2017, used here.8 P-cores and 8 E-cores; 24 threads. Intel Thread Director supported.
ClocksPrecision Boost and XFR supported; AMD states up to 4.2 GHz with XFR under suitable cooling, separate from the published 4.0 GHz maximum boostP-cores: 3.2 GHz base, up to 5.1 GHz Turbo Boost 2.0 and 5.2 GHz Turbo Boost Max 3.0; E-cores: 2.4 GHz base, up to 3.9 GHz turbo.
CacheL1 1536 KB; L2 8 MB30 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 14 MB total L2.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoYes
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredIntel UHD Graphics 770; 32 execution units; 300 MHz base, up to 1.55 GHz; Quick Sync Video; up to four displays.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA1700
Base power180 W125 W
Maximum power–241 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2667 MT/sUp to 128 GB; two channels; DDR5-4800 or DDR4-3200; 76.8 GB/s; ECC supported with an appropriate platform.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 lanesPCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 20 CPU lanes: 1 × 16 + 4 or 2 × 8 + 4; DMI 4.0 × 8.
Process14 nmIntel 7; Alder Lake; 45 × 37.5 mm package; 100°C maximum junction temperature.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CNo cooler included with the boxed K processor (Intel support).

More comparisons