AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X vs Intel Core i9-9940X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X compared with Core i9-9940X
AMDRyzen Threadripper 2920XIntelCore i9-9940X
Overview
ReleasedOctober 20182018
Cores and clocks
Cores1214 (better)
Threads2428 (better)
Base clock3.5 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock4.3 GHz4.5 GHz (better)
L3 cache32 MB (better)19.25 MB
CoresColfax; Zen+ architecture; boxed product ID YD292XA8AFWOF. X399 motherboards may require a BIOS update. AMD's October launch release confirms availability on 29 October 2018; its support page gives October 2018.Skylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksPrecision Boost 2, XFR2 and Precision Boost Overdrive supportedTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.50 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.40 GHz. Intel planned November 2018 availability. ASCII’s contemporary report confirms Japanese retail sale on 21 December 2018, but earlier worldwide sale was not established; year precision is retained.
CacheL1 1152 KB; L2 6 MB19.25 MB Intel Smart Cache; L3 designation confirmed by the exact Newegg listing.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA2066
Base power180 W165 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2933 MT/sUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR 4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 processor lanes, 72 lanes across the processor and X399 platform44 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X 299; LGA 2066.
Process12 nm14 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 88°C.

More comparisons