Intel Core i5-14400F vs Intel Core i7-9700K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Core i5-14400F compared with Core i7-9700K
IntelCore i5-14400FIntelCore i7-9700K
Overview
ReleasedJanuary 2024October 2018
Cores and clocks
Cores10 (6 performance, 4 efficiency) (better)8
Threads16 (better)8
Base clock2.5 GHz3.6 GHz
Boost clock4.7 GHz4.9 GHz (better)
L3 cache20 MB (better)12 MB
Cores6 Performance-cores and 4 Efficient-cores, with Hyper-Threading; codename Raptor LakeEight cores without Hyper-Threading; Intel Turbo Boost 2.0 supported.
ClocksP-core base 2.5 GHz, max turbo 4.7 GHz; E-core base 1.8 GHz, max turbo 3.5 GHzMaximum turbo is a single-core frequency; sustained clocks depend on cooling and motherboard power settings. Intel's current specification page publishes TDP without a separate maximum turbo-power figure.
Cache20 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 9.5 MB L2–
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoYes
GraphicsNone; a graphics card is requiredIntel UHD Graphics 630; 350 MHz base, up to 1.2 GHz; three displays; Quick Sync Video. HDMI up to 4096×2304 at 24 Hz; DisplayPort and eDP up to 4096×2304 at 60 Hz.
Platform
SocketLGA1700LGA1151
Base power65 W95 W
Maximum power148 W–
UnlockedNoYes
Cooler in the box–No
Memory supportUp to DDR5 4800 MT/s or up to DDR4 3200 MT/s; 2 channels, up to 192 GBUp to 128 GB; two channels; DDR4-2666; 41.6 GB/s maximum bandwidth; ECC not supported.
PCIePCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 20 lanes (Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4); DMI 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0; 16 CPU lanes, configured as 1×16, 2×8 or 1×8+2×4. Intel's launch figure of 40 platform lanes includes chipset lanes.
ProcessIntel 714 nm; Coffee Lake; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 100°C maximum junction temperature. Intel confirms a soldered thermal interface for the unlocked ninth-generation launch models.
Coolermax operating temperature 100 °C; thermal specification PCG 2020CBoxed processor includes no fan or heatsink. Intel 300-series motherboard compatibility requires the appropriate BIOS and vendor support.

More comparisons