Sony E 11mm F1.8 vs Sony E 15mm F1.4 G

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

E 11mm F1.8 compared with E 15mm F1.4 G
SonyE 11mm F1.8SonyE 15mm F1.4 G
Overview
ReleasedJune 2022June 2022
Optics
Lens typePrimePrime
Focal length11 mm15 mm
Maximum aperturef/1.8f/1.4
Minimum aperturef/16f/16
Optical constructionTwelve elements in eleven groupsThirteen elements in twelve groups
Special elementsThree aspherical elements and three ED glass elementsThree aspherical elements, one ED glass element and one Super ED glass element
DiaphragmSeven rounded bladesSeven rounded blades
Angle of view104° APS-C87° APS-C
Mount and compatibility
MountsSony ESony E
Image circleAPS-CAPS-C
Image circle detailAPS-C coverage; 16.5 mm equivalent field of viewAPS-C coverage; 22.5 mm equivalent field of view
Teleconverter supportNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TCNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TC
Focus and stabilisation
AutofocusYesYes
Minimum focus distance0.12 m (manual focus)0.17 m (manual focus)
Maximum magnification0.2× (manual focus)0.15× (manual focus)
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Autofocus detailTwo linear motors and internal focusing; maker does not designate these motors XDTwo linear motors and internal focusing; maker does not designate these motors XD
Focus distance detailMinimum focus 0.15 m in AF or 0.12 m in MF; Linear Response MFMinimum focus 0.20 m in AF or 0.17 m in MF; Linear Response MF
Magnification detailMaximum magnification 0.13× in AF or 0.20× in MFMaximum magnification 0.12× in AF or 0.15× in MF
Stabilisation detailNo optical stabilisation; compatible bodies provide stabilisationNo optical stabilisation; compatible bodies provide stabilisation
Video featuresReduced focus breathing; breathing compensation requires a compatible camera, changes field of view and image quality slightly, and may not fully compensate breathingReduced focus breathing; breathing compensation requires a compatible camera, changes field of view and image quality slightly, and may not fully compensate breathing
Design
Dust and moisture resistantYesYes
Filter diameter55 mm55 mm
Maximum diameter66 mm66.6 mm
Length57.5 mm69.5 mm
Weight181 g (better)219 g
ControlsAF/MF switch, manual-focus ring and one customisable focus-hold button; no aperture ringAperture ring with click on/off switch, AF/MF switch, manual-focus ring and one customisable focus-hold button; no aperture-ring lock
Weather resistanceDust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proofDust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proof
Dimensions detail66 mm maximum diameter × 57.5 mm length; internal focusing66.6 mm maximum diameter × 69.5 mm length; internal focusing
Weight detailApproximately 181 g lens; separate hood and caps excludedApproximately 219 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded
Lens hoodALC-SH170 petal bayonet hoodALC-SH171 petal bayonet hood
In the boxALC-SH170 hood, ALC-F55S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listedALC-SH171 hood, ALC-F55S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listed
Release detailSony Hong Kong specified mid-June 2022 availability, earlier than the July release described in Amateur Photographer. Both independently authored full reviews used ZV-E10: Photography Blog Mark Goldstein and Amateur Photographer Amy Davies. Raw distortion and practical corrected-image impressions are distinguished. Maker diameter 66 mm and length 57.5 mm supersede their reversed order in Amateur Photographer. Unconfirmed fluorine coating in Photography Blog is omittedSony Hong Kong specified mid-June 2022 availability. Independent full reviews were authored by Photography Blog Mark Goldstein, testing ZV-E10, and Digital Camera World Matthew Richards, whose sample images identify Alpha 7R III. Their wide-open sharpness results differ. Sony specifies one ED plus one Super ED element, superseding Photography Blog’s two ED claim. This is a G lens, not the G Master designation used in parts of that review; its unconfirmed fluorine coating is omitted

More comparisons