Sony FE 12-24mm F2.8 GM vs Sony FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

FE 12-24mm F2.8 GM compared with FE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
SonyFE 12-24mm F2.8 GMSonyFE 16-35mm F2.8 GM
Overview
ReleasedJuly 2020July 2017
Optics
Lens typeZoomZoom
Focal length12–24 mm16–35 mm
Maximum aperturef/2.8f/2.8
Minimum aperturef/22f/22
Optical construction17 elements in 14 groupsSixteen elements in thirteen groups; floating focus mechanism with independently driven groups
Special elementsThree XA extreme-aspherical elements, one aspherical element, three ED and two Super ED glass elementsFive aspherical elements in total including two XA elements; two ED elements
CoatingsNano AR Coating II; fluorine coating on front elementSony Nano AR coating and front-element fluorine coating
DiaphragmNine rounded bladesEleven rounded blades
Angle of view122°–84° full frame; 99°–61° APS-C107°–63° full frame; 83°–44° APS-C
Mount and compatibility
MountsSony ESony E
Image circleFull frameFull frame
Image circle detailFull-frame coverage; 18–36 mm equivalent field of view on APS-CFull-frame coverage; 24–52.5 mm equivalent field of view on APS-C
Teleconverter supportNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TCNot compatible with Sony E-mount teleconverters
Focus and stabilisation
AutofocusYesYes
Minimum focus distance0.28 m0.28 m
Maximum magnification0.14×0.19×
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Autofocus detailFour XD linear motors, two per floating focus group; internal focusingTwo direct-drive SSM units drive the floating focusing groups
Focus distance detailMinimum focus 0.28 m throughout the zoom range; Linear Response MF0.28 m minimum focus distance
Magnification detailMaximum magnification 0.14×0.19× maximum magnification
Stabilisation detailNo lens stabilisation; compatible bodies provide stabilisationNo optical stabilisation; compatible camera body stabilisation can be used
Video features–Constant F2.8 maximum aperture and quiet direct-drive SSM focusing
Design
Dust and moisture resistantYesYes
Filter diameter–82 mm
Maximum diameter97.6 mm88.5 mm
Length137 mm121.6 mm
Weight847 g680 g (better)
ControlsAF/MF switch, one customisable focus-hold button, zoom and focus rings; no aperture ringManual-focus and zoom rings, AF/MF switch and customisable focus-hold button; hood release button
Filter detailNo front filter thread; rear holder accepts cut sheet filters, with cutting template supplied82 mm front filter thread
Weather resistanceDust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proofDust and moisture resistant design with rubber mount ring; not guaranteed to prevent all ingress
Dimensions detail–88.5 mm maximum diameter × 121.6 mm maker length; lens extends at wider zoom settings (Photography Blog and OpticalLimits)
Weight detailApproximately 847 g lens with integral hood; separate caps excludedApproximately 680 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded
Lens hoodFixed petal hood integrated into the lensALC-SH149 petal bayonet hood, supplied
In the boxLocking front cap, ALC-R1EM rear cap, soft carrying case and filter templateALC-SH149 hood, ALC-F82S front cap, ALC-R1EM rear cap and soft carrying case
Release detailSony Australia specified late July 2020 availability; Sony UK specified August for Europe and Japan specified 7 August, separate from 14 July pre-orders. Main date uses the earliest maker-confirmed July precision. TechRadar’s 24–48 mm APS-C equivalent is inconsistent with maker18–36 mm; Photography Blog’s focal-range section uses the APS-C angles, with maker full-frame angles retained here. Review distortion and corner-darkening differences are preservedSony Canada announcement dated 17 May 2017 initially specifies August; revised Sony Japan maker release of 14 July brings Japan sale forward to 28 July 2017. Main date uses July, exact first global day unconfirmed. Two independent full reviews read: Photography Blog Mark Goldstein and OpticalLimits Klaus Schroiff, both Alpha 7R II. Differing edge sharpness, autofocus speed and balance assessments retained; OL sample centring good. OL optical table undercounts asphericals, maker five total including two XA used; Blog full-frame angle mistakenly uses APS-C83–44degree figures, maker107–63 used. No inferred predecessor link

More comparisons