AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X vs Intel Core i7-9800X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 1900X compared with Core i7-9800X
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1900XIntelCore i7-9800X
Overview
ReleasedAugust 2017November 2018
Cores and clocks
Cores88
Threads1616
Base clock3.8 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock4 GHz4.5 GHz (better)
L3 cache16 MB16.5 MB (better)
CoresZen architecture; boxed product ID YD190XA8AEWOF. AMD confirms first availability on 31 August 2017.Skylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksAMD states up to 4.2 GHz with XFR under suitable cooling, separate from the published 4.0 GHz maximum boostTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.50 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.40 GHz. Intel’s October announcement states November availability; Kakaku lists November 2018 release for this exact model. The maker-confirmed exact first-sale day remains unverified.
CacheL1 768 KB; L2 4 MB16.5 MB Intel Smart Cache; L3 designation confirmed by the exact Newegg listing.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA2066
Base power180 W165 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2667 MT/sUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 lanes44 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X299; LGA2066.
Process14 nm14 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 95°C.

More comparisons