AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X vs Intel Core i9-9900X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X compared with Core i9-9900X
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1920XIntelCore i9-9900X
Overview
ReleasedAugust 20172018
Cores and clocks
Cores12 (better)10
Threads24 (better)20
Base clock3.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock4 GHz4.5 GHz (better)
L3 cache32 MB (better)19.25 MB
CoresZen architecture; boxed product ID YD192XA8AEWOF. AMD's support page lists 31 July 2017, when pre-orders began; its press release confirms on-shelf availability on 10 August 2017, used here.Skylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksAMD states up to 4.2 GHz with XFR under suitable cooling, separate from the published 4.0 GHz maximum boostTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.50 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.40 GHz. Intel’s October 2018 announcement planned November availability. Ark’s contemporary exact-model report confirms Japanese retail sale on 14 December 2018, but earlier worldwide sale was not established; year precision is retained.
CacheL1 1152 KB; L2 6 MB19.25 MB Intel Smart Cache; L3 designation confirmed by ComputerBase’s exact-model technical table and Newegg listing.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA2066
Base power180 W165 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2667 MT/sUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 lanes44 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X299; LGA2066.
Process14 nm14 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 92°C.

More comparisons