Intel Core i5-14400F vs Intel Core i9-9900X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Core i5-14400F compared with Core i9-9900X
IntelCore i5-14400FIntelCore i9-9900X
Overview
ReleasedJanuary 20242018
Cores and clocks
Cores10 (6 performance, 4 efficiency)10
Threads1620 (better)
Base clock2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock4.7 GHz (better)4.5 GHz
L3 cache20 MB (better)19.25 MB
Cores6 Performance-cores and 4 Efficient-cores, with Hyper-Threading; codename Raptor LakeSkylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksP-core base 2.5 GHz, max turbo 4.7 GHz; E-core base 1.8 GHz, max turbo 3.5 GHzTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.50 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.40 GHz. Intel’s October 2018 announcement planned November availability. Ark’s contemporary exact-model report confirms Japanese retail sale on 14 December 2018, but earlier worldwide sale was not established; year precision is retained.
Cache20 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 9.5 MB L219.25 MB Intel Smart Cache; L3 designation confirmed by ComputerBase’s exact-model technical table and Newegg listing.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsNone; a graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketLGA1700LGA2066
Base power65 W165 W
Maximum power148 W–
UnlockedNoYes
Cooler in the box–No
Memory supportUp to DDR5 4800 MT/s or up to DDR4 3200 MT/s; 2 channels, up to 192 GBUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 20 lanes (Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4); DMI 4.0 x844 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X299; LGA2066.
ProcessIntel 714 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
Coolermax operating temperature 100 °C; thermal specification PCG 2020CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 92°C.

More comparisons