AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X vs Intel Core i9-9960X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Ryzen Threadripper 1950X compared with Core i9-9960X
AMDRyzen Threadripper 1950XIntelCore i9-9960X
Overview
ReleasedAugust 20172018
Cores and clocks
Cores1616
Threads3232
Base clock3.4 GHz3.1 GHz
Boost clock4 GHz4.5 GHz (better)
L3 cache32 MB (better)22 MB
CoresZen architecture; boxed product ID YD195XA8AEWOF. AMD's support page lists 31 July 2017, when pre-orders began; its press release confirms on-shelf availability on 10 August 2017, used here.Skylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksPrecision Boost and XFR supported; AMD states up to 4.2 GHz with XFR under suitable cooling, separate from the published 4.0 GHz maximum boostTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.50 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.40 GHz. Intel planned November 2018 availability. ASCII’s contemporary report confirms Japanese retail sale on 21 December 2018, but earlier worldwide sale was not established; year precision is retained.
CacheL1 1536 KB; L2 8 MB22 MB Intel Smart Cache; L3 designation confirmed by the exact Newegg listing.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsA separate graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketsTR4LGA2066
Base power180 W165 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportDDR4; four channels; up to 2667 MT/sUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR 4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 3.0; 64 lanes44 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X 299; LGA 2066.
Process14 nm14 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
CoolerNo cooler included; maximum operating temperature 68°CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 85°C.

More comparisons