A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 54
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| A&D MedicalUA-611 | BeurerBM 54 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | – |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric measurement with fuzzy-logic-controlled inflation; designed for adult home use; first on-sale date not established | Automatic oscillometric measurement on the upper arm during deflation; first on-sale date not established |
| Accuracy | Maker specification ±3 mmHg pressure and ±5% pulse; pressure range 0–299 mmHg, systolic 60–279 mmHg, diastolic 40–200 mmHg and pulse 40–180 beats/min | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this is distinct from an independent clinical validation result |
| Clinical validation | A&D UK claims ESH 2010 validation; Medaval identifies the UK BIHS recommendation as manufacturer-declared equivalence to the UA-651 and says the equivalence study is unpublished. The US Validate BP listing covers UA-611 under ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018 with different cuff options; this does not establish direct validation of the supplied UK cuff configuration | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the current manual and an ESH validation claim in its datasheet |
| Features | Irregular heartbeat indicator, pressure progress bar, WHO classification indicator, stored-reading average and automatic power-off; irregular heartbeat indication is not a specific AFib diagnosis | Coloured risk scale, irregular heartbeat warning, automatic switch-off and incorrect usage message; no cuff fit check or resting indicator |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–32 cm | 22–44 cm |
| Cuff | Supplied latex-free and metal-free SlimFit cuff fits 22–32 cm; optional large cuff fits 31–45 cm, sold separately; UK manual says this model is not designed for a small cuff | Universal upper-arm cuff supplied |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Users | – | 2 |
| Readings stored | 30 | 60 per user (better) |
| Bluetooth and app | No | Yes |
| Memory | Last 30 blood pressure and pulse measurements, with stored-reading average; no separate user memories listed | Average of all saved readings and morning/evening averages for the last seven days; date and time stored |
| App | No Bluetooth; readings can be recorded manually | Bluetooth transfer to the free beurer HealthManager Pro app |
| Power | Four AA 1.5 V batteries; maker claims approximately 700 measurements with LR6 alkaline batteries or 200 with R6P manganese batteries at 180 mmHg and 23°C. UA-611 has no DC socket; the optional adapter in the shared manual applies only to UA-651 | Four 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and pulse shown with battery, irregular heartbeat and pressure/classification indicators | Non-illuminated LCD, 7.6 × 7.0 cm; illuminated control button |
| Size | Approximately 96 × 68 × 130 mm (width × height × depth); approximately 230 g excluding batteries | 13.90 × 9.40 × 4.80 cm (L × W × H) |
| In the box | UA-611 monitor, 22–32 cm SlimFit cuff, instruction manual and four AA batteries in the UK pack | Monitor, 22–44 cm cuff, four AAA batteries, storage bag, quick guide and blood pressure pass |
More comparisons
- Beurer BM 54 vs Withings BPM Connect
- Beurer BM 54 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 53 vs Beurer BM 54
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs A&D Medical UA-611Plus
- Beurer BM 54 vs Beurer BM 59
- Beurer BC 54 vs Beurer BM 54
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Rossmax AU941f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Rossmax AX356f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 23
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 25
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 27
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 28
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 35
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 38
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 51 easyClip
- Beurer BM 54 vs Microlife BP B1 BT

