A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 25
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| A&D MedicalUA-611 | BeurerBM 25 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | – |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric measurement with fuzzy-logic-controlled inflation; designed for adult home use; first on-sale date not established | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement during deflation; first on-sale date not established |
| Accuracy | Maker specification ±3 mmHg pressure and ±5% pulse; pressure range 0–299 mmHg, systolic 60–279 mmHg, diastolic 40–200 mmHg and pulse 40–180 beats/min | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this specification is distinct from clinical validation |
| Clinical validation | A&D UK claims ESH 2010 validation; Medaval identifies the UK BIHS recommendation as manufacturer-declared equivalence to the UA-651 and says the equivalence study is unpublished. The US Validate BP listing covers UA-611 under ANSI/AAMI/ISO 81060-2:2018 with different cuff options; this does not establish direct validation of the supplied UK cuff configuration | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the manual; exact independent registry confirmation was not established |
| Features | Irregular heartbeat indicator, pressure progress bar, WHO classification indicator, stored-reading average and automatic power-off; irregular heartbeat indication is not a specific AFib diagnosis | Single start/stop button, cuff fit check, irregular heartbeat warning, classification scale and automatic switch-off; maker lists no resting indicator or calculated averages |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–32 cm | 22–42 cm |
| Cuff | Supplied latex-free and metal-free SlimFit cuff fits 22–32 cm; optional large cuff fits 31–45 cm, sold separately; UK manual says this model is not designed for a small cuff | Supplied upper-arm cuff |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Readings stored | 30 | – |
| Bluetooth and app | No | No |
| Memory | Last 30 blood pressure and pulse measurements, with stored-reading average; no separate user memories listed | – |
| App | No Bluetooth; readings can be recorded manually | Scan & Save in beurer HealthManager Pro uses a smartphone camera to record the display; no Bluetooth connection |
| Power | Four AA 1.5 V batteries; maker claims approximately 700 measurements with LR6 alkaline batteries or 200 with R6P manganese batteries at 180 mmHg and 23°C. UA-611 has no DC socket; the optional adapter in the shared manual applies only to UA-651 | Four 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries or optional DC 5 V, 1 A mains adaptor through USB-C; USB-C is for mains operation, not charging the disposable batteries |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Systolic pressure, diastolic pressure and pulse shown with battery, irregular heartbeat and pressure/classification indicators | Non-illuminated LCD, 4.4 × 5.3 cm, with black digits; maker lists no date/time display |
| Size | Approximately 96 × 68 × 130 mm (width × height × depth); approximately 230 g excluding batteries | 12.00 × 9.00 × 4.00 cm (L × W × H) |
| In the box | UA-611 monitor, 22–32 cm SlimFit cuff, instruction manual and four AA batteries in the UK pack | Monitor, 22–42 cm cuff and four AAA batteries |
More comparisons
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 53
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs A&D Medical UA-611Plus
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 54
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Rossmax AU941f
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AU941f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Rossmax AX356f
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AX356f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 23
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AG1
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AS1-2
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 27
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 28
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 35
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 38
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 51 easyClip

