Apple iMac G3 (1998) vs Apple iMac G3 (Mid 1999)

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

iMac G3 (1998) compared with iMac G3 (Mid 1999)
AppleiMac G3 (1998)AppleiMac G3 (Mid 1999)
Overview
ReleasedAugust 1998April 1999
Performance
ProcessorPowerPC G3 233 MHz (iMac)PowerPC G3 333 MHz (iMac)
CPU cores11
GraphicsATI RAGE IIc (2 MB)ATI RAGE Pro Turbo (6 MB)
Memory32 MB or 128 MB32 MB or 128 MB
Storage4 GB6 GB (better)
CPU233 MHz PowerPC G3 processor with 66 MHz system bus and 512 KB backside L2 cache at 117 MHz. The exact silicon supplier is not established by the maker sheet; generic clock-only chip record.333 MHz PowerPC G3 with 66 MHz system bus and 512 KB backside L2 cache. Generic clock-only record does not infer a silicon supplier.
GPUATI RAGE IIc with 2 MB SGRAM standard; maker options increase video memory to 4 MB or 6 MB. Configurations retain the standard graphics allocation.ATI RAGE Pro Turbo with 6 MB video memory. The retained maker resolution table includes a conflicting 2 MB column; The exact Macworld review and EveryMac specification identify 6 MB for this revision.
Memory type32 MB SDRAM standard in two SO-DIMM slots; original July 1998 Apple datasheet supports up to 128 MB. Do not substitute the Revision B maximum.32 MB SDRAM in two SO-DIMM slots. Current retained maker sheet gives a 128 MB maximum; older Apple developer history and contemporary Macworld review give 256 MB. The conservative configurations retain the current maker maximum.
Storage type4 GB IDE hard drive and tray-loading 24x CD-ROM drive. No floppy drive.6 GB ATA hard drive and tray-loading 24x CD-ROM.
Display
Screen size15″15″
Resolution1024 × 7681024 × 768
Refresh rate75 Hz75 Hz
Display typeNominal 15-inch shadow-mask CRT with 13.8-inch viewable diagonal and 0.28 mm dot pitch; it has no fixed LCD native resolution.Nominal 15-inch CRT with 13.8-inch viewable diagonal; not a fixed-native-resolution LCD.
Display featuresMaximum supported mode 1024 × 768 at 75 Hz; 800 × 600 at 95 Hz and 640 × 480 at 117 Hz. The scalar refresh rate describes the highest-resolution mode.1024 × 768 at 75 Hz, 800 × 600 at 95 Hz and 640 × 480 at 117 Hz (EveryMac exact-model specification).
Connections
Ports2 × USB-A, Ethernet, 2 × headphone jack2 × USB-A, Ethernet, 2 × headphone jack
Ethernet0.1 Gb/s0.1 Gb/s
Back portsTwo 12 Mbps USB ports on the computer, 10/100BASE-T Ethernet, 56K V.90/K56flex modem, 4 Mbps IrDA, audio line-in and line-out, plus two front headphone jacks. No FireWire or external VGA output.Two USB ports on the computer, 10/100BASE-T Ethernet, 56K V.90 modem, audio line-in/out and two front headphone jacks. No FireWire, external VGA output or AirPort option. The infrared port and mezzanine slot from earlier revisions are absent (EveryMac).
SpeakersBuilt-in stereo speakers with SRS surround processing and built-in microphone.Built-in stereo speakers with SRS processing and microphone.
Keyboard and mouseApple USB Keyboard and round Apple USB Mouse.Apple USB Keyboard and round Apple USB Mouse; Blueberry, Grape, Tangerine, Lime and Strawberry case colours.
Design and power
TypeAll-in-oneAll-in-one
Operating systemmacOSmacOS
Size and weight detailCurrent retained maker sheet: height 15.8, width 15.2 and depth 17.6 inches, weight 40 pounds. Original Apple July 1998 datasheet instead gives height 39.5, width 38 and depth 44 cm, weight 17.3 kg (38.1 pounds). Conflicting main metric values are omitted.Maker does not publish a weight in the retained sheet; height 15.8, width 15.2 and depth 17.6 inches. No converted or sibling metric values are added.
Power supplyRetained maker sheet lists 80 W maximum continuous power; the original Apple datasheet lists 200 W. This conflict is retained rather than selecting a scalar rating.–
In the boxMac OS 8.1. First on sale 15 August 1998, corroborated by Apple’s contemporary retrospective release and retained introduction date.Mac OS 8.5.1. Conservative April 1999 sale month follows Golem’s contemporary report quoting immediate shipping; retained maker introduction date and database day disagree.

More comparisons