Beurer BC 54 vs Microlife BP W70 BT

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

BC 54 compared with BP W70 BT
BeurerBC 54MicrolifeBP W70 BT
Overview
Released––
Measuring
TypeWristWrist
Irregular heartbeat detectionYesYes
AFib detection or ECG–No
MethodAutomatic oscillometric wrist measurement during inflation; first on-sale date not establishedAutomatic oscillometric wrist measurement during inflation, Comfort+ pressure control and Quiet Inflation technology. European BP W70 BT; non-Bluetooth W70 is separate hardware. First-sale date not established
AccuracyMaker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this is distinct from independent clinical validationManufacturer's BP3KN1-3B regulatory-filed US draft specifies static pressure accuracy ±3 mmHg and pulse ±5% of readout. European product page gives systolic 60–255 mmHg, diastolic 40–200 mmHg and pulse 40–199 beats/minute; cuff-pressure display range 0–299 mmHg is separate
Clinical validationBeurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the current manual and an ESH validation claim in its datasheetEuropean maker claims clinical ISO validation but independent exact-model study not recovered; headline omitted. FCC radio authorisation is not clinical validation
FeaturesColoured risk scale, irregular heartbeat warning, date/time and automatic switch-off; maker lists no position or resting indicatorEuropean page describes MAM three-measurement averaging, while Asia-Pacific page describes SmartMAM without a count. US regulatory draft describes three readings with 15-second intervals and an additional reading if needed, despite stray double-measurement wording. Keep regional mode differences explicit. Ordinary IHB, cuff-fit and movement checks; no dedicated AFib screening
Cuff
Cuff fits13.5–21.5 cm13.5–21.5 cm
CuffAttached wrist cuffEuropean and French maker pages specify 13.5–21.5 cm wrist cuff; US BP3KN1-3B draft specifies 13.5–23 cm. Headline retains European range rather than transferring the larger regional cuff
Connections and memory
Users22
Readings stored60 per user99 per user (better)
Bluetooth and appYesYes
MemoryAverage of all saved measurements and morning/evening averages for the last seven daysFrench maker page confirms two users with 99 stored readings each. US draft describes time-button user selection, last-three-reading average excluding suboptimal cuff fit, oldest-record overwrite and retention after battery replacement; these operating details are regional draft evidence, not a confirmed final European instruction revision
AppBluetooth transfer to the free beurer HealthManager Pro appBluetooth Low Energy transfer to Microlife Connected Health+ (European maker). Asia-Pacific maker specifies Bluetooth 4.2; exact European version omitted. Regulatory-filed US draft has older pairing instructions, so current app controls may differ
PowerTwo 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries; maker claims approximately 150 measurements depending on pressure and Bluetooth useTwo 1.5 V AAA alkaline batteries (European maker); US regulatory draft claims approximately 300 measurements with new batteries. No internal charging established
Design
Display detailsIlluminated LCD, 4.7 × 4.5 cm; white digits on a black backgroundLCD with memory, ON/OFF and time controls; wrist-position guidance and traffic-light scale. US regulatory draft describes blue LED and five height-guidance levels; its IP22 rating is not transferred as a confirmed European rating
Size8.00 × 6.90 × 7.60 cm (L × W × H), current maker product page82 × 64 × 13.9 mm. European, French and Asia-Pacific sites state 78 ±5 g including batteries; US regulatory draft states 120 ±5 g including batteries. Conflicting regional mass claims retained rather than treated as a settled measurement
In the boxWrist monitor, two AAA batteries, storage box, quick guide and blood pressure passUS regulatory-filed draft lists instructions, storage box, blood-pressure diary and two AAA cells; European package contents not independently confirmed

More comparisons