Beurer BM 54 vs Omron M4 Intelli IT
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| BeurerBM 54 | OmronM4 Intelli IT | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | – |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Clinically validated | – | Yes |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| AFib detection or ECG | – | No |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric measurement on the upper arm during deflation; first on-sale date not established | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement; HEM-7155T-EBK, distinct from M4 Connect AFib HEM-7196T1-FLE. First on-sale date not established |
| Accuracy | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this is distinct from an independent clinical validation result | Maker's pressure accuracy ±3 mmHg and pulse accuracy ±5% of displayed reading; systolic range 60–260 mmHg, diastolic 40–215 mmHg and pulse 40–180 beats/minute |
| Clinical validation | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the current manual and an ESH validation claim in its datasheet | Maker manual states an 85-subject investigation under EN ISO 81060-2:2014 and compliance with 2019+A1:2020, plus pregnancy/preeclampsia and type II diabetes validation. Medaval attributes BIHS/STRIDE BP recommendations to equivalence with BP760N HEM-7320-Z, while noting that unpublished equivalence evidence cannot be verified against MDR requirements; these are not published exact-model trials |
| Features | Coloured risk scale, irregular heartbeat warning, automatic switch-off and incorrect usage message; no cuff fit check or resting indicator | Irregular-heartbeat, movement, cuff-wrap and high-blood-pressure indicators. Exact manual supports displaying the average of the latest two or three readings within ten minutes despite the web table marking averaging absent. No automatic consecutive three-reading mode, AFib screening or ECG recording |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–44 cm | 22–42 cm |
| Cuff | Universal upper-arm cuff supplied | Included HEM-FL31 Intelli Wrap cuff, 22–42 cm arm circumference; approximately 145 × 532 mm, 750 mm tube and 163 g |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Users | 2 | 2 |
| Readings stored | 60 per user | 60 per user |
| Bluetooth and app | Yes | Yes |
| Memory | Average of all saved readings and morning/evening averages for the last seven days; date and time stored | Up to 60 readings per user for two users; guest measurements are not saved |
| App | Bluetooth transfer to the free beurer HealthManager Pro app | Bluetooth Low Energy transfer to OMRON connect; 2.4 GHz GFSK radio. Date and time set automatically when paired; radio can be disabled |
| Power | Four 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries | Four AA batteries included, DC 6 V / 4 W; optional AC adapter sold separately. Approximately 1000 measurements using new alkaline batteries |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Non-illuminated LCD, 7.6 × 7.0 cm; illuminated control button | Digital LCD; monitor IP20. Adapter IP21/IP22 classifications do not apply to the monitor |
| Size | 13.90 × 9.40 × 4.80 cm (L × W × H) | Approximately 105 × 85 × 152 mm (W × H × L); 340 g without batteries |
| In the box | Monitor, 22–44 cm cuff, four AAA batteries, storage bag, quick guide and blood pressure pass | Monitor, HEM-FL31 cuff, four AA batteries, storage case, instruction manuals 1/2 and setup instructions |
More comparisons
- Beurer BM 54 vs Withings BPM Connect
- Beurer BM 54 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 53 vs Beurer BM 54
- Beurer BM 54 vs Beurer BM 59
- Beurer BC 54 vs Beurer BM 54
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 54
- Beurer BM 54 vs Microlife BP B1 BT
- Beurer BM 54 vs Microlife BP B3 BT
- Beurer BM 54 vs Microlife BP B4 BT
- Beurer BM 54 vs Omron M2+ Connect (HEM-7188T1-LE)
- Beurer BM 48 vs Omron M4 Intelli IT
- Beurer BM 59 vs Omron M4 Intelli IT
- Beurer BM 54 vs Rossmax X3 BT

