beyerdynamic DT 1990 PRO vs Focal Elear

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

DT 1990 PRO compared with Elear
beyerdynamicDT 1990 PROFocalElear
Overview
ReleasedSeptember 20162016
Sound
TypeOver-earOver-ear
Noise cancellingNoNo
Driver size45 mm40 mm
BackOpenOpen
Impedance250 ohms80 ohms
Bluetooth codecsNone (wired)None (wired)
Drivers45 mm Tesla dynamic drivers, open; 5 – 40,000 Hz; 102 dB SPL (1 mW, 500 Hz); max. 125 dB SPL (200 mW, 500 Hz); THD < 0.05% (1 mW, 500 Hz); rated power handling 200 mW40 mm aluminium/magnesium 'M'-shaped dome, full range with no crossover; 5 Hz – 23 kHz; sensitivity 104 dB SPL (1 mW, 1 kHz); THD < 0.3% (1 kHz, 100 dB SPL); impedance 80 ohms on Focal Naim North America's page, 32 ohms on Focal's 2016 product data sheet
Battery
Listening time (maker's claim)No battery (wired)No battery (wired)
Design
Weight370 g (better)450 g
Headphone cableYesYes
Fit and ear tipsCircumaural, open-back; nominal contact pressure approx. 6.6 N; replaceable headband padding and ear pads, two sets supplied ("analytical" for a neutral sound, "balanced" with slightly more bass)Circumaural, open-back; 20 mm memory foam ear pads covered in microfibre; leather headband with length adjustment and ear cup rotation; aluminium yoke
Works with3 m straight cable and 5 m coiled cable (extended), detachable, with a 3-pin mini-XLR connector on one side; gold-plated 3.5 mm stereo jack with 6.35 mm adapter (the manual; beyerdynamic's product page lists a 6.35 mm jack plug)OFC cable with a 6.35 mm stereo jack and two self-locking 3.5 mm jacks at the ear cups; 3 m on Focal Naim North America's page, 4 m on the 2016 data sheet
In the boxHeadphones, two sets of ear pads, 3 m straight cable, 5 m coiled cable, hard caseHeadphones, OFC cable (6.35 mm to 2 x 3.5 mm), rigid carrying case with magnetic lock

More comparisons