Intel Core i5-14400F vs Intel Core i9-9920X

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Core i5-14400F compared with Core i9-9920X
IntelCore i5-14400FIntelCore i9-9920X
Overview
ReleasedJanuary 20242018
Cores and clocks
Cores10 (6 performance, 4 efficiency)12 (better)
Threads1624 (better)
Base clock2.5 GHz3.5 GHz
Boost clock4.7 GHz (better)4.5 GHz
L3 cache20 MB (better)19.25 MB
Cores6 Performance-cores and 4 Efficient-cores, with Hyper-Threading; codename Raptor LakeSkylake-X refresh; Hyper-Threading and an unlocked multiplier, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model launch table.
ClocksP-core base 2.5 GHz, max turbo 4.7 GHz; E-core base 1.8 GHz, max turbo 3.5 GHzTurbo Boost Max 3.0 up to 4.50 GHz on the preferred cores; ordinary Turbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.40 GHz. Intel planned November 2018 availability. ASCII’s contemporary report confirms Japanese retail sale on 21 December 2018, but earlier worldwide sale was not established; year precision is retained.
Cache20 MB Intel Smart Cache (L3); 9.5 MB L219.25 MB Intel Smart Cache; L 3 designation confirmed by Overclockers.ru’s exact-model table.
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsNone; a graphics card is requiredNo processor graphics, explicitly confirmed by Intel’s exact-model support table.
Platform
SocketLGA1700LGA2066
Base power65 W165 W
Maximum power148 W–
UnlockedNoYes
Cooler in the box–No
Memory supportUp to DDR5 4800 MT/s or up to DDR4 3200 MT/s; 2 channels, up to 192 GBUp to 128 GB; four channels of DDR 4-2666; 85 GB/s maximum published bandwidth; no ECC.
PCIePCIe 5.0 and 4.0; 20 lanes (Up to 1x16+4, 2x8+4); DMI 4.0 x844 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0. The 68-lane family platform figure includes chipset lanes.
Chipsets–Intel X 299; LGA 2066.
ProcessIntel 714 nm; Skylake-X refresh.
Coolermax operating temperature 100 °C; thermal specification PCG 2020CIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product. Intel’s support article confirms solder thermal interface material for this exact model; published junction limit 92°C.

More comparisons