Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i7-4790K
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| IntelCore i7-10700K | IntelCore i7-4790K | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | May 2020 | June 2014 |
| Cores and clocks | ||
| Cores | 8 (better) | 4 |
| Threads | 16 (better) | 8 |
| Base clock | 3.8 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock | 5.1 GHz (better) | 4.4 GHz |
| L3 cache | 16 MB (better) | 8 MB |
| Cores | Hyper-Threading supported; Intel Turbo Boost Max 3.0 targets favoured cores. Thermal Velocity Boost is not supported. | Four cores with Hyper-Threading; Intel Turbo Boost 2.0 supported. The current maker page lists Transactional Synchronization Extensions as unsupported, superseding early review specifications. |
| Clocks | Up to 5.1 GHz with Turbo Boost Max 3.0, or 5 GHz with Turbo Boost 2.0. Configurable TDP-down to 95 W with a 3.5 GHz base clock. Tom's Hardware reports 229 W PL2; the current Intel specification page publishes TDP only. | Maximum turbo is a single-core frequency; overclocking requires an appropriate motherboard and cooling. Intel publishes TDP without a separate maximum turbo-power figure. |
| Graphics and AI | ||
| Built-in graphics | Yes | Yes |
| Graphics | Intel UHD Graphics 630; 350 MHz base, up to 1.2 GHz; up to 64 GB shared graphics memory; three displays. HDMI up to 4096×2160 at 30 Hz; DisplayPort up to 4096×2304 at 60 Hz; Quick Sync Video supported. | Intel HD Graphics 4600; 20 execution units; 350 MHz base, up to 1.25 GHz; three displays; Quick Sync Video. HDMI up to 3840×2160 at 24 Hz; DisplayPort and eDP up to 3840×2160 at 60 Hz; VGA up to 1920×1200 at 60 Hz. |
| Platform | ||
| Socket | LGA1200 | LGA1150 |
| Base power | 125 W | 88 W |
| Unlocked | Yes | Yes |
| Cooler in the box | No | – |
| Memory support | Up to 128 GB; two channels; DDR4-2933; 45.8 GB/s maximum bandwidth; ECC not supported. | Up to 32 GB; two channels; DDR3-1333/1600 or DDR3L-1333/1600 at 1.5 V, as listed by Intel; 25.6 GB/s maximum bandwidth; ECC not supported. |
| PCIe | PCIe 3.0; 16 CPU lanes, configured as 1×16, 2×8 or 1×8+2×4. | PCIe 3.0; 16 CPU lanes, configured as 1×16, 2×8 or 1×8+2×4. |
| Process | 14 nm; Comet Lake; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 100°C maximum junction temperature. Tom's Hardware identifies the ten-core die with two cores disabled and a soldered thermal interface. | 22 nm; Devil's Canyon, a Haswell refresh; 37.5 × 37.5 mm package; 74.04°C Tcase limit, not a junction-temperature limit. New polymer thermal interface and additional capacitors, described in Intel's Computex launch coverage and the exact-model reviews. |
| Cooler | No cooler included with the boxed processor (Tom's Hardware exact-model review); an LGA1200-compatible thermal solution is required. | Intel lists both ordinary boxed and explicitly fanless boxed SKUs; cooler contents should be checked for the particular package. Compatible Intel 8- and 9-series chipsets require the appropriate motherboard BIOS. Intel's June 2014 fact sheet confirms volume availability that month; the announcement itself is not used as the on-sale day. |
More comparisons
- Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS
- Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Core i9-14900KS
- Intel Core i5-14400F vs Intel Core i7-10700K
- Intel Core i5-14500 vs Intel Core i7-10700K
- Intel Core i5-14400F vs Intel Core i7-4790K
- Intel Core i5-14500 vs Intel Core i7-4790K
- Intel Core i5-14600K vs Intel Core i7-10700K
- Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i7-14700K
- Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i9-14900K
- Intel Core i5-14600K vs Intel Core i7-4790K
- Intel Core i7-14700K vs Intel Core i7-4790K
- Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Core i9-14900K
- Intel Core i7-10700K vs Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Intel Core i7-4790K vs Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i7-10700K
- Intel Core i3-13100F vs Intel Core i7-4790K
