Intel Core i7-4960X vs Intel Core i7-5820K

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

Core i7-4960X compared with Core i7-5820K
IntelCore i7-4960XIntelCore i7-5820K
Overview
ReleasedSeptember 2013August 2014
Cores and clocks
Cores66
Threads1212
Base clock3.6 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock4 GHz (better)3.6 GHz
L3 cache15 MB15 MB
CoresIvy Bridge-E; 6 cores with Hyper-Threading. The unlocked multiplier is confirmed by the exact-model reviews.Haswell-E; six cores with Hyper-Threading; unlocked multiplier and lack of integrated graphics confirmed by exact-model reviews
ClocksTurbo Boost 2.0 up to 4.00 GHz. September availability follows contemporary Ivy Bridge-E store availability coverage and Expert Reviews’ 10 September exact-model review with a retail supplier and price. Intel gives Q3 2013; an exact maker first-sale day was not established.–
Graphics and AI
Built-in graphicsNoNo
GraphicsNo processor graphics, confirmed by Intel’s exact-model comparison-chart row; a separate graphics solution is required.–
Platform
SocketLGA2011LGA2011-v3
Base power130 W140 W
UnlockedYesYes
Cooler in the boxNoNo
Memory supportUp to 64 GB; four channels of DDR3-1333/1600/1866; maximum bandwidth 59.7 GB/s; no ECC.Up to 64 GB; four channels; DDR4-1600/1866/2133; maximum bandwidth 68 GB/s; no ECC support
PCIe40 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.028 CPU lanes; PCIe 3.0
ChipsetsX79 and LGA2011, confirmed by the exact-model reviews.X99 and LGA2011-v3, as distinguished by Intel's Core i7 comparison chart and exact-model reviews. August release month follows Intel's 29 August family availability notice and contemporary exact-model stock coverage; an exact maker-SKU first-sale day was not established.
Process22 nm; Ivy Bridge-E. Package size 52.5 × 45.0 mm.22 nm; package size 52.5 × 45 mm
CoolerIntel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product; a separate compatible cooler is required.Intel explicitly excludes a fan and heatsink from the boxed product; a separate cooler is required

More comparisons