Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS compared with E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS
SonyE 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSSSonyE PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS
Overview
ReleasedFebruary 2018December 2013
Optics
Lens typeZoomZoom
Focal length18–135 mm18–105 mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5–5.6f/4
Minimum aperturef/22–36f/22
Optical constructionSixteen elements in twelve groupsSixteen elements in twelve groups
Special elementsOne aspherical element and two ED glass elementsThree aspherical elements and two ED elements
DiaphragmSeven rounded bladesSeven rounded blades
Angle of view76°–12° APS-C76°–15° APS-C
Mount and compatibility
MountsSony ESony E
Image circleAPS-CAPS-C
Image circle detailAPS-C coverage; 27–202.5 mm equivalent field of viewAPS-C coverage; 27–157.5 mm equivalent field of view
Teleconverter supportNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TCNot compatible with Sony E-mount teleconverters
Focus and stabilisation
AutofocusYesYes
Minimum focus distance0.45 m0.45 m
Maximum magnification0.29×0.11×
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Autofocus detailLinear autofocus motor; no XD designation publishedQuiet focusing using Sony Handycam-derived mechanism; read maker pages do not identify a specific AF motor type
Focus distance detail0.45 m minimum focusMinimum focus distance 0.45 m at 18 mm and 0.95 m at 105 mm
Magnification detail0.29× maximum magnification0.11× maximum magnification
Stabilisation detailOptical SteadyShot; no maker lens-only stop rating published. Digital Camera World found approximately 2.5 stops in its test, not a maker guaranteeBuilt-in Optical SteadyShot; no maker stop rating published
Video features–Constant F4 aperture, quiet zoom and focus operation, variable-speed power zoom lever
Design
Filter diameter55 mm72 mm
Maximum diameter67.2 mm78 mm
Length88 mm110 mm
Weight325 g (better)427 g
ControlsSeparate zoom and manual-focus rings and AF/MF switchSeparate focus and zoom rings and continuously variable-speed power zoom lever
Zoom designExtending zoom barrel; Photography Blog measured approximately 25 mm additional extension at 135 mmPowered zoom; overall barrel length remains constant during zoom and focus
Filter detail55 mm front filter thread; filter does not rotate during focusing (Photography Blog)72 mm front filter thread
Weather resistance–No maker dust or moisture resistance claim in read exact pages
Dimensions detail67.2 mm maximum diameter × 88 mm length78 mm maximum diameter × 110 mm maker length
Weight detailApproximately 325 g lens; separate hood and caps excludedApproximately 427 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded
Lens hoodALC-SH153 petal bayonet hoodALC-SH128 petal bayonet hood, supplied
In the boxALC-SH153 hood, ALC-F55S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listedALC-SH128 hood and front and rear caps; no case listed
Release detailSony Europe announced 5 January 2018 and specified February 2018 availability. Full independent reviews: Photography Blog Mark Goldstein on Alpha 6500 and Digital Camera World Matthew Richards. Their long-end edge sharpness and distortion/fringing results differ; raw and corrected-image impressions are distinguished. Sony’s 325 g weight supersedes Digital Camera World326 g, and no listed case supersedes Photography Blog’s supplied-case claim. Sony’s 27 mm equivalent wide end supersedes Photography Blog28 mm. No unconfirmed coatings or weather resistance importedSony Japan announcement dated 27 August 2013 specifies December availability; exact first global sale day unconfirmed. Two full independent reviews read: Photography Blog Mark Goldstein on Alpha 5100 and OpticalLimits Klaus Schroiff on NEX-7, sample centring described as okay with slightly softer right side. Different handling and distortion findings retained, processing and body context qualified. Blog supporting sharpness pages incorrectly label lens F3.5–5.6; maker constant F4 used. OpticalLimits erroneous equivalent focal range corrected to maker 27–157.5mm. Review barrel material descriptions disagree and are omitted; no inferred predecessor link

More comparisons