Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G vs Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| SonyE 16-55mm F2.8 G | SonyE 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | September 2019 | February 2018 |
| Optics | ||
| Lens type | Zoom | Zoom |
| Focal length | 16–55 mm | 18–135 mm |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | f/3.5–5.6 |
| Minimum aperture | f/22 | f/22–36 |
| Optical construction | Seventeen elements in twelve groups | Sixteen elements in twelve groups |
| Special elements | Two AA (advanced aspherical) elements, two further aspherical elements and three ED glass elements | One aspherical element and two ED glass elements |
| Coatings | Nano AR Coating and fluorine-coated front element | – |
| Diaphragm | Nine rounded blades | Seven rounded blades |
| Angle of view | 83°–29° APS-C | 76°–12° APS-C |
| Mount and compatibility | ||
| Mounts | Sony E | Sony E |
| Image circle | APS-C | APS-C |
| Image circle detail | APS-C coverage; 24–82.5 mm equivalent field of view | APS-C coverage; 27–202.5 mm equivalent field of view |
| Teleconverter support | Not compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TC | Not compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TC |
| Focus and stabilisation | ||
| Autofocus | Yes | Yes |
| Minimum focus distance | 0.33 m | 0.45 m |
| Maximum magnification | 0.2× | 0.29× |
| Optical stabilisation | No | Yes |
| Autofocus detail | XD linear motor for autofocus | Linear autofocus motor; no XD designation published |
| Focus distance detail | 0.33 m minimum focus; Linear Response MF | 0.45 m minimum focus |
| Magnification detail | 0.20× maximum magnification | 0.29× maximum magnification |
| Stabilisation detail | No optical stabilisation; compatible bodies provide stabilisation | Optical SteadyShot; no maker lens-only stop rating published. Digital Camera World found approximately 2.5 stops in its test, not a maker guarantee |
| Design | ||
| Dust and moisture resistant | Yes | – |
| Filter diameter | 67 mm | 55 mm |
| Maximum diameter | 73 mm | 67.2 mm |
| Length | 100 mm | 88 mm |
| Weight | 494 g | 325 g (better) |
| Controls | Separate zoom and manual-focus rings, AF/MF switch and one customisable focus-hold button; no aperture ring | Separate zoom and manual-focus rings and AF/MF switch |
| Zoom design | Barrel extends during zooming; Photography Blog measured approximately 35 mm additional extension from 16 to 55 mm | Extending zoom barrel; Photography Blog measured approximately 25 mm additional extension at 135 mm |
| Filter detail | 67 mm front filter thread; front filter does not rotate during focusing (Photography Blog) | 55 mm front filter thread; filter does not rotate during focusing (Photography Blog) |
| Weather resistance | Dust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proof | – |
| Dimensions detail | 73 mm maximum diameter × 100 mm length | 67.2 mm maximum diameter × 88 mm length |
| Weight detail | Approximately 494 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded | Approximately 325 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded |
| Lens hood | ALC-SH161 petal bayonet hood | ALC-SH153 petal bayonet hood |
| In the box | ALC-SH161 hood, ALC-F67S front cap, ALC-R1EM rear cap and soft case | ALC-SH153 hood, ALC-F55S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listed |
| Release detail | Sony Hong Kong specified end of September 2019 availability. Photography Blog Mark Goldstein tested Alpha 6600. Digital Camera World Chris George and Matthew Richards identify Alpha 6600 sample images and Alpha 6400 lab testing. Their long-end corner assessments differ; Digital Camera World explicitly removed forced distortion correction for raw lab testing. Reviews’ historical stabilised-body lists are not used as a current compatibility restriction | Sony Europe announced 5 January 2018 and specified February 2018 availability. Full independent reviews: Photography Blog Mark Goldstein on Alpha 6500 and Digital Camera World Matthew Richards. Their long-end edge sharpness and distortion/fringing results differ; raw and corrected-image impressions are distinguished. Sony’s 325 g weight supersedes Digital Camera World326 g, and no listed case supersedes Photography Blog’s supplied-case claim. Sony’s 27 mm equivalent wide end supersedes Photography Blog28 mm. No unconfirmed coatings or weather resistance imported |
More comparisons
- Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G vs Sony E PZ 16-50mm F3.5-5.6 OSS II
- Sony E 11mm F1.8 vs Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G
- Sony E 15mm F1.4 G vs Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G
- Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G vs Sony E PZ 10-20mm F4 G
- Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS
- Sony DT 16–50mm F2.8 SSM vs Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G
- Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G vs Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS
- Sony E 16-55mm F2.8 G vs Sony E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS
- Sony Vario-Sonnar T* DT 16–80mm F3.5–4.5 ZA vs Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS
- Sony Vario-Tessar T* E 16-70mm F4 ZA OSS vs Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS
- Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E PZ 18-105mm F4 G OSS
- Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS LE
- Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E PZ 18-110mm F4 G OSS
- Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E PZ 18-200mm F3.5-6.3 OSS

