Sony E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS vs Sony E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

E 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSS compared with E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS
SonyE 18-135mm F3.5-5.6 OSSSonyE 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS
Overview
ReleasedFebruary 2018October 2019
Optics
Lens typeZoomZoom
Focal length18–135 mm70–350 mm
Maximum aperturef/3.5–5.6f/4.5–6.3
Minimum aperturef/22–36f/22–32
Optical constructionSixteen elements in twelve groupsNineteen elements in thirteen groups
Special elementsOne aspherical element and two ED glass elementsOne aspherical element and three ED glass elements
DiaphragmSeven rounded bladesSeven rounded blades
Angle of view76°–12° APS-C22°–4°40′ APS-C
Mount and compatibility
MountsSony ESony E
Image circleAPS-CAPS-C
Image circle detailAPS-C coverage; 27–202.5 mm equivalent field of viewAPS-C coverage; 105–525 mm equivalent field of view
Teleconverter supportNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TCNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TC
Focus and stabilisation
AutofocusYesYes
Minimum focus distance0.45 m1.1 m
Maximum magnification0.29×0.23×
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Autofocus detailLinear autofocus motor; no XD designation publishedXD linear motor for autofocus
Focus distance detail0.45 m minimum focusMinimum focus 1.1 m at wide angle or 1.5 m at telephoto
Magnification detail0.29× maximum magnification0.23× maximum magnification at 350 mm
Stabilisation detailOptical SteadyShot; no maker lens-only stop rating published. Digital Camera World found approximately 2.5 stops in its test, not a maker guaranteeOptical SteadyShot; no maker lens-only stop rating published. Digital Camera World measured approximately three stops in its test, not a maker guarantee
Design
Dust and moisture resistant–Yes
Filter diameter55 mm67 mm
Maximum diameter67.2 mm77 mm
Length88 mm142 mm
Weight325 g (better)625 g
ControlsSeparate zoom and manual-focus rings and AF/MF switchSeparate zoom and manual-focus rings, AF/MF switch, OSS on/off switch, zoom lock and one customisable focus-hold button
Zoom designExtending zoom barrel; Photography Blog measured approximately 25 mm additional extension at 135 mmExtending zoom barrel with lock; Photography Blog measured approximately 48 mm additional extension at 350 mm
Filter detail55 mm front filter thread; filter does not rotate during focusing (Photography Blog)67 mm front filter thread; filter does not rotate during focusing (Photography Blog)
Weather resistance–Dust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proof
Dimensions detail67.2 mm maximum diameter × 88 mm length77 mm maximum diameter × 142 mm length
Weight detailApproximately 325 g lens; separate hood and caps excludedApproximately 625 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded
Lens hoodALC-SH153 petal bayonet hoodALC-SH160 round bayonet hood
In the boxALC-SH153 hood, ALC-F55S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listedALC-SH160 hood, ALC-F67S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listed
Release detailSony Europe announced 5 January 2018 and specified February 2018 availability. Full independent reviews: Photography Blog Mark Goldstein on Alpha 6500 and Digital Camera World Matthew Richards. Their long-end edge sharpness and distortion/fringing results differ; raw and corrected-image impressions are distinguished. Sony’s 325 g weight supersedes Digital Camera World326 g, and no listed case supersedes Photography Blog’s supplied-case claim. Sony’s 27 mm equivalent wide end supersedes Photography Blog28 mm. No unconfirmed coatings or weather resistance importedSony Hong Kong specified mid-October 2019 availability. Photography Blog Mark Goldstein tested Alpha 6600; Digital Camera World Chris George and Matthew Richards identify Alpha 6600 sample images and Alpha 6400 raw lab testing. Stabilisation, long-end sharpness and flare judgments differ. Sony’s 1.1 m wide-angle focus supersedes Photography Blog’s repeated 1.5 m. Its 350 mm sharpness prose incorrectly says F5.6 despite F6.3 test crops. Digital Camera World raw lab distortion results supersede its conflicting all-focal-length pincushion prose. Unpublished fluorine/Nano AR/Linear Response MF claims are not borrowed from the 16–55 sibling

More comparisons