Sony E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS vs Sony E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

E 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSS compared with E 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS
SonyE 55-210mm F4.5-6.3 OSSSonyE 70-350mm F4.5-6.3 G OSS
Overview
ReleasedOctober 2011October 2019
Optics
Lens typeZoomZoom
Focal length55–210 mm70–350 mm
Maximum aperturef/4.5–6.3f/4.5–6.3
Minimum aperturef/22–32f/22–32
Optical constructionThirteen elements in nine groupsNineteen elements in thirteen groups
Special elementsTwo ED glass elements and two aspherical elementsOne aspherical element and three ED glass elements
DiaphragmSeven rounded bladesSeven rounded blades
Angle of view28.2°–7.8° APS-C22°–4°40′ APS-C
Mount and compatibility
MountsSony ESony E
Image circleAPS-CAPS-C
Image circle detailAPS-C coverage; 82.5–315 mm equivalent field of viewAPS-C coverage; 105–525 mm equivalent field of view
Teleconverter supportNot compatible with Sony E-mount teleconvertersNot compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TC
Focus and stabilisation
AutofocusYesYes
Minimum focus distance1 m1.1 m
Maximum magnification0.225×0.23×
Optical stabilisationYesYes
Autofocus detailInternal motor and internal focusing; no specific motor designation published in read maker pageXD linear motor for autofocus
Focus distance detail1.0 m minimum focus; electronically coupled manual-focus ringMinimum focus 1.1 m at wide angle or 1.5 m at telephoto
Magnification detail0.225× maximum magnification0.23× maximum magnification at 350 mm
Stabilisation detailOptical SteadyShot; Sony’s original announcement claims up to approximately four stops, not guaranteed under every condition. Current spec page leaves stop rating blankOptical SteadyShot; no maker lens-only stop rating published. Digital Camera World measured approximately three stops in its test, not a maker guarantee
Design
Dust and moisture resistant–Yes
Filter diameter49 mm67 mm
Maximum diameter63.8 mm77 mm
Length108 mm142 mm
Weight345 g (better)625 g
ControlsSeparate zoom and manual-focus rings; focus mode and optical stabilisation selected on the cameraSeparate zoom and manual-focus rings, AF/MF switch, OSS on/off switch, zoom lock and one customisable focus-hold button
Zoom designExtending zoom barrel; internal focusingExtending zoom barrel with lock; Photography Blog measured approximately 48 mm additional extension at 350 mm
Filter detail–67 mm front filter thread; filter does not rotate during focusing (Photography Blog)
Weather resistance–Dust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proof
Dimensions detail63.8 mm maximum diameter × 108 mm length; aluminium-alloy exterior77 mm maximum diameter × 142 mm length
Weight detailApproximately 345 g lens; separate hood and caps excludedApproximately 625 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded
Lens hoodALC-SH115 round bayonet hoodALC-SH160 round bayonet hood
In the boxALC-SH115 hood, front cap and rear cap; no case listedALC-SH160 hood, ALC-F67S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listed
Release detailSony Japan’s original announcement specifies October 2011, matching contemporaneous Photography Blog US launch coverage. Exact global first day unconfirmed. Full independent tests: Optical Limits/Photozone Klaus Schroiff, NEX-7, March 2012, and Sony Alpha Blog Marc Alhadeff, Alpha 6000, December 2018. Their long-end usability and autofocus impressions differ. Sony’s aluminium alloy and two aspherical plus two ED elements supersede Optical Limits magnesium-alloy/four-aspherical descriptions. No unconfirmed coatings or weather sealing adoptedSony Hong Kong specified mid-October 2019 availability. Photography Blog Mark Goldstein tested Alpha 6600; Digital Camera World Chris George and Matthew Richards identify Alpha 6600 sample images and Alpha 6400 raw lab testing. Stabilisation, long-end sharpness and flare judgments differ. Sony’s 1.1 m wide-angle focus supersedes Photography Blog’s repeated 1.5 m. Its 350 mm sharpness prose incorrectly says F5.6 despite F6.3 test crops. Digital Camera World raw lab distortion results supersede its conflicting all-focal-length pincushion prose. Unpublished fluorine/Nano AR/Linear Response MF claims are not borrowed from the 16–55 sibling

More comparisons