Sony FE 28mm F2 vs Sony FE 35mm F1.8

Every spec side by side, from each maker's published figures.

Better figure, where one is clearly better

FE 28mm F2 compared with FE 35mm F1.8
SonyFE 28mm F2SonyFE 35mm F1.8
Overview
ReleasedMarch 2015August 2019
Optics
Lens typePrimePrime
Focal length28 mm35 mm
Maximum aperturef/2f/1.8
Minimum aperturef/22f/22
Optical constructionNine elements in eight groups11 elements in nine groups
Special elementsThree aspherical elements including one AA (advanced aspherical), and two ED glass elementsOne aspherical element
CoatingsAll lens surfaces multi-coated to suppress flare and ghosting–
DiaphragmNine rounded bladesNine rounded blades
Angle of view75° full frame; 54° APS-C63° full frame; 44° APS-C
Mount and compatibility
MountsSony ESony E
Image circleFull frameFull frame
Image circle detailFull-frame coverage; 42 mm equivalent field of view on APS-CFull-frame coverage; 52.5 mm equivalent field of view on APS-C
Teleconverter supportNot compatible with Sony E-mount teleconverters; SEL075UWC ultra-wide converter gives 21 mm F2.8, SEL057FEC fisheye converter gives 16 mm F3.5Not compatible with SEL14TC or SEL20TC
Focus and stabilisation
AutofocusYesYes
Minimum focus distance0.25 m (manual focus)0.22 m
Maximum magnification0.16× (manual focus)0.24×
Optical stabilisationNoNo
Autofocus detailLinear motor; internal focusing without changing overall lens lengthLinear motor; internal focusing
Focus distance detail0.29 m minimum in autofocus; 0.25 m in manual focusMinimum focus 0.22 m; Linear Response MF
Magnification detail0.13× in autofocus; 0.16× in manual focus–
Stabilisation detailNo optical stabilisationNo lens stabilisation; compatible bodies provide stabilisation
Video features–Internal focusing reduces changes in angle of view during focusing; quiet focus drive supports fine continuous focus movements
Design
Dust and moisture resistantYesYes
Filter diameter49 mm55 mm
Maximum diameter64 mm65.6 mm
Length60 mm73 mm
Weight200 g (better)280 g
ControlsManual-focus ring; focus mode selected on camera; aluminium-alloy exteriorAF/MF switch and one customisable focus-hold button
Filter detail–55 mm front filter thread; front element does not rotate during focusing
Weather resistanceDust and moisture resistant design; not guaranteed to prevent all ingressDust- and moisture-resistant design; not guaranteed completely dust- or moisture-proof
Dimensions detail64 mm maximum diameter × 60 mm lengthAluminium-alloy exterior; internal focusing preserves overall length
Weight detailApproximately 200 g lens; separate hood and caps excludedApproximately 280 g lens; separate hood and caps excluded
Lens hoodALC-SH112 petal bayonet hood, suppliedALC-SH159 petal bayonet hood
In the boxALC-SH112 hood, front cap and rear cap; no case listedALC-SH159 hood, ALC-F55S front cap and ALC-R1EM rear cap; no case listed
Release detailSony Singapore’s5 March2015 press release reproduced in full by Shutter Journey states this exact lens available from March2015 onwards; exact first day unconfirmed. SonyJapan gives17 April2015 and SonyUS May2015, so main release retains earlier Singapore month. Announcement3March2015 is the dated SonyUS release reproduced by DPReview. SonyHK launch PDF availability table could not be retrieved through proxy, so no date borrowed from it. Full exact independent reviews read: Photography Blog MarkGoldstein Alpha7S and Amateur Photographer AndyWestlake predominantlyAlpha7 withAlpha7R AF experience. Blog copied28–70 lens name in sharpness intro and incorrect55mm thread/54° full-frame angle/no-case contradiction; exact maker49mm/75°/no-case fields supersede these. Reviews retained with body and raw-correction qualificationsSony Japan specified 30 August 2019; main date retains month precision for regional release. Amateur Photographer Andy Westlake tested an Alpha 7R III; Photography Blog Mark Goldstein used an Alpha 7 III. Their distortion type/severity, wide-open sharpness and close-up blur judgments differ and are retained. Maker weight 280 g supersedes Blog 281 g; no case is listed in the maker specifications despite Blog mentioning one

More comparisons