vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| vivoX200 Ultra | vivoX50 Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | April 2025 | June 2020 |
| Display | ||
| Screen size | 6.82″ | 6.56″ |
| Resolution | 3168 × 1440 (better) | 2376 × 1080 |
| Sharpness | 510 pixels per inch (better) | 398 pixels per inch |
| Panel | LTPO OLED | OLED |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz (better) | 90 Hz |
| Peak brightness | 4,500 nits (better) | 1,300 nits |
| Display type | 8T LTPO AMOLED, adaptive 1–120 Hz | E3 AMOLED with curved display; main hardware and configuration describe the global version |
| Always-on display | – | Always-on display, Android Authority |
| Pixel density | 510 ppi | – |
| Brightness detail | 4,500 nits local peak | – |
| Screen protection | Armor Glass | Schott Xensation Up glass, Gadgets360 |
| Display features | 1.07 billion colours, P3 gamut, 8,000,000:1 contrast and HDR; 93.3% screen ratio; circular polariser, 1 Pulse DC-like dimming and 2,160 Hz PWM | 180 Hz response rate, DCI-P3 gamut, 6,000,000:1 contrast and 92% screen-to-body ratio, maker; HDR10+, Android Authority |
| Performance | ||
| Chip | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G |
| Memory | 12 GB – 16 GB (better) | 8 GB |
| Storage | 256 GB, 512 GB, 1 TB (better) | 256 GB |
| CPU | Eight 64-bit cores, 2 × 4.32 GHz + 6 × 3.53 GHz; 3 nm process | Snapdragon 765G; 1×2.5 GHz Kryo 475 Prime, 1×2.2 GHz Kryo 475 Gold and 6×1.8 GHz Kryo 475 Silver, Android Authority |
| GPU | Qualcomm Adreno 830 | Adreno 620, Android Authority |
| Storage type | Four-channel LPDDR5X Ultra and UFS 4.1; China V2454A/V2454DA configurations 12 GB/256 GB, 16 GB/512 GB and 16 GB/1 TB with satellite communication; photography bundle uses same 1 TB model | 8 GB RAM and 256 GB storage; UFS 2.1 and no microSD slot, Gadgets360 |
| Cooling | Vapour chamber with capillary wick and nanofluid cooling | – |
| Cameras | ||
| Main camera | 50 MP (better) | 48 MP |
| Ultra wide camera | 50 MP | 8 MP |
| Telephoto camera | 200 MP | 8 MP |
| Optical zoom | 3.7× | 5× (better) |
| Front camera | 50 MP (better) | 32 MP |
| Main camera | 50 MP Sony LYT-818, 1/1.28-inch sensor, f/1.69, 35 mm equivalent, ZEISS T* coating, autofocus and CIPA 5.0 OIS | Sony IMX598, f/1.6, seven-element lens and closed-loop motor; double-ball suspension gimbal with up to ±3° rotation, maker laboratory specification |
| Ultra wide camera | 50 MP Sony LYT-818, 1/1.28-inch sensor, f/2.0, 14 mm equivalent, autofocus and CIPA 5.0 OIS | f/2.2; 120° lens angle or 108° after distortion correction; 2.5 cm macro focus |
| Telephoto camera | 200 MP HP9, 1/1.4-inch sensor, f/2.27, 85 mm equivalent, 1G2P4P floating periscope, autofocus and CIPA 5.0 OIS | Periscope 8 MP f/3.4 with 5× optical zoom |
| Second telephoto camera | – | Portrait 13 MP f/2.46 with 50 mm equivalent lens; 2× zoom identified by Android Authority |
| Front camera | 50 MP, f/2.45; autofocus identified by Digital Camera World | f/2.45 |
| Zoom | Maker specifies 3.7× optical telephoto and up to 105× digital; its zoom scale uses 23 mm as 1× despite 35 mm main lens; optional 2.35× ZEISS extender provides 200 mm equivalent | 60× Hyper Zoom |
| Video recording | Up to 8K; rear cameras support 4K120 slow motion, 4K60 10-bit Log, 4K60 Dolby Vision, 4K portrait and time-lapse; Rec.709 monitoring | Main camera 4K at 60 fps, Android Authority and Gadgets360; five-axis gimbal/EIS combination, Smart Zoom, sound tracking and Instant Vlog, maker |
| Front video | Up to 4K60, identified by Android Central | 1080p recording, Gadgets360 |
| Camera features | V3+ and VS1 imaging chips; RAW, spatial photo/video, stage, street, landscape, portrait, underwater, food and Pro modes; zoom flash | Super Night, Astro, Supermoon and Pro Sports modes; motion autofocus tracking and gimbal position indicator |
| Battery and charging | ||
| Battery | 6,000 mAh (better) | 4,315 mAh |
| Wired charging | Up to 90 W (better) | Up to 33 W |
| Wireless charging | Up to 40 W (better) | None |
| Battery life detail | Single-cell 6,000 mAh/22.80 Wh typical and 5,880 mAh/22.35 Wh rated at 3.80 V; third-generation silicon anode and semi-solid technology; maker claims up to 18.3 days 4G single-SIM standby or 23.4 hours VoLTE calls in laboratory tests | Typical capacity |
| Wired charging | 90 W FlashCharge | FlashCharge 2.0 with 11 V/3 A adapter; current maker 33 W controls Gadgets360's isolated 22 W paragraph, which contradicts its own 33 W specification |
| Wireless charging | 40 W wireless FlashCharge | No wireless charging, Android Authority |
| Charges other devices | OTG reverse charging supported | – |
| Connectivity | ||
| Satellite messaging | Yes | – |
| Mobile network | GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz; WCDMA B1/2/4/5/6/8/19; LTE TDD B34/38/39/40/41/42/43/48, FDD B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/12/17/18/19/20/25/26/28/66; 5G n1/2/3/5/7/8/12/18/20/25/26/28/38/40/41/48/66/77/78/79/80/81/83/84/89 | Global GSM 850/900/1800/1900; WCDMA B1/2/4/5/8; LTE FDD B1/2/3/4/5/7/8/20, TDD B38/40/41; 5G n41/n77/n78 |
| SIM | Two nano-SIMs, dual standby; dual 5G active on supported SA/VoNR band combinations | Dual nano-SIM with dual standby |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi 6 and 7; 2.4 GHz, 5.1 GHz and 5.8 GHz; Wi-Fi Display, 2 × 2 MIMO, MU-MIMO and concurrent 2.4/5 GHz | 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz MIMO |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.4; SBC, AAC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless, LDAC and LHDC 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| NFC | Reader and card-emulation modes, including vivo Wallet, SIM and HCE payments; SIM payment requires SIM1 | Supported on global maker version |
| Satellite features | BeiDou short-message communication only on 16 GB/1 TB model, with China Mobile service activation; not available on smaller configurations | – |
| USB | USB-C, USB 3.2 Gen 1, OTG and DisplayPort output; USB-C headphone connection | USB-C, USB 2.0 and OTG; no headphone socket, Android Authority |
| Positioning | GPS L1/L5, BeiDou B1C/B1I/B2a, GLONASS G1, Galileo E1/E5a, QZSS L1/L5, A-GPS, cellular and Wi-Fi positioning | GPS, BeiDou, GLONASS and Galileo |
| Design | ||
| Type | Standard | Standard |
| Weight | 232 g | 181.5 g (better) |
| Thickness | 8.69 mm | 8.04 mm (better) |
| Height × width | 163.14 × 76.76 mm | 158.46 × 72.8 mm |
| Materials | – | AG matte glass back, maker; aluminium frame, Android Authority |
| Water and dust resistance | IP68 | – |
| Colours | Black Ka and Red Circle 232 g; Silver Tone 229 g, all 8.69 mm thick | Alpha Grey |
| Buttons | Two-stage pressure-sensitive camera control; double press opens camera, half press locks focus/exposure when configured, sliding adjusts exposure, lens or zoom | – |
| Water resistance detail | IP68 and IP69 | – |
| Biometrics | 3D ultrasonic single-point fingerprint sensor and face recognition | In-display fingerprint scanning |
| Sensors | Accelerometer, ambient light, proximity, gyroscope, compass, front/rear colour temperature, laser focusing, infrared remote, flicker and multispectral sensors; X-axis linear vibration motor | Accelerometer, ambient light sensor, e-compass, proximity sensor and physical gyroscope |
| Speakers | Dual speakers | Single speaker, Android Authority; AK4377A independent Hi-Res audio chip, maker; Android Authority's AK4337A spelling conflicts with maker |
| Software | ||
| Operating system | Android | Android |
| Software at launch | Android 15 with China-market OriginOS 5 | Android 10 with Funtouch OS 10.5, Gadgets360 |
| In the box | – | Phone, XE710 earphones and USB-C adapter, documentation, USB-C cable, power adapter, SIM ejector, case and applied protective film |
| AI features | AI image expansion, erase, object moving, weather changes and automatic composition | – |
More comparisons
- vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X300 Ultra
- vivo X300 Ultra vs vivo X50 Pro
- vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X300 FE
- vivo X300 FE vs vivo X50 Pro
- OnePlus OnePlus 15 vs vivo X200 Ultra
- vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X300 Pro
- vivo X200 Ultra vs vivo X300
- vivo X300 vs vivo X50 Pro
- vivo X300 Pro vs vivo X50 Pro
- iQOO iQOO 15 vs vivo X200 Ultra
- Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max vs vivo X200 Ultra
- vivo X200 FE vs vivo X200 Ultra
- vivo X200 FE vs vivo X50 Pro
- vivo X200 Pro vs vivo X200 Ultra
- OPPO Find X8 Pro vs vivo X200 Ultra
- vivo X200 Ultra vs Xiaomi Xiaomi 15 Ultra

