Audi Q2 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| AudiQ2 | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | August 2016 | November 2018 |
| Performance | ||
| Powertrain | Petrol | Mild hybrid, Plug-in hybrid |
| Power | 114–148 bhp | 158–265 bhp (better) |
| 0–62 mph | 8.6–10.5 s | 7.2–10.3 s (better) |
| Top speed | 122–135 mph (better) | 118–132 mph |
| Engine or motors | 1.0-litre TFSI (999 cc, 116 PS) or 1.5-litre TFSI (1,498 cc, 150 PS); bhp converted from Audi's PS figures | 1.5-litre three-cylinder petrol mild hybrid, 160 PS (P160); 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel mild hybrid, 163 PS (D165) or 204 PS (D200); 1.5-litre petrol plug-in hybrid, 269 PS system output (P270e); bhp converted from Land Rover's PS figures. UK 0–60 mph: 9.7 s (P160), 9.2 s (D165), 7.9 s (D200), 6.8 s (P270e); 0–62 mph figures are from Land Rover Germany (the German plug-in hybrid is rated at 268 PS) |
| Torque | 200 Nm (116 PS), 250 Nm (150 PS) | 260 Nm (P160), 380 Nm (D165), 430 Nm (D200), 540 Nm (P270e) |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual or 7-speed S tronic (150 PS only) | 9-speed automatic |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | All-wheel drive; front-wheel drive with the P160 |
| Practicality | ||
| Body | SUV | SUV |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot | 405 litres | 472 litres (better) |
| Length | 4,216 mm | 4,371 mm |
| Width | 1,802 mm | – |
| Weight | From 1,255 kg | From 1,717 kg |
| Boot | 405 litres, 1,050 litres with the rear seats folded | 472 litres dry (591 litres wet) with the rear seats up; 1,156 litres dry (1,383 litres wet) with them folded; 40:20:40 split rear seat |
| Towing | 1,300 kg braked (116 PS), 1,500 kg (150 PS) | Braked: 2,000 kg (D165, D200), 1,600 kg (P270e); not rated for towing (P160); 750 kg unbraked; 100 kg nose weight |
| Size | 4,208–4,216 mm long, 1,794–1,802 mm wide without mirrors, 1,502–1,549 mm high; weight without driver is 1,255 kg (116 PS) to 1,305 kg (150 PS S tronic) (Audi technical sheets) | 4,371 mm long, 1,996 mm wide with mirrors folded (2,100 mm with mirrors out), 1,649 mm high; 2,681 mm wheelbase; 11.6 m turning circle (kerb to kerb); 212 mm ground clearance; 530 mm wading depth; P160 unladen weight is 1,717 kg DIN without a driver (1,792 kg EU with a driver) |
| Range and charging | ||
| Zero-emission range (WLTP) | – | 37.9 miles |
| Battery | – | 11.5 kWh |
| Fastest charging | – | 32 kW |
| Economy (WLTP) | – | 36–196.4 mpg |
| Range detail | – | P270e: WLTP electric range 37.9 miles combined, 46.6 miles city |
| Charging | – | P270e: 11.5 kWh usable battery; 0–80% in about 30 minutes at 32 kW DC (CCS); 0–100% in about 2 hours 12 minutes on a 7 kW AC charger |
| Efficiency | WLTP combined: 43.5–48.7 mpg across the UK range (Audi UK); depends on specification | WLTP combined: 34.9–36.0 mpg (P160), 42.6–44.6 mpg (D165), 41.4–44.6 mpg (D200), 196.4 mpg weighted and 182.9 Wh/km (P270e) |
| CO2 emissions | 132–148 g/km, WLTP combined | 32–184 g/km (WLTP combined) |
| Tech and safety | ||
| Infotainment | 12.3-inch Audi virtual cockpit and 8.8-inch MMI touch display as standard from the 2024 update | Pivi Pro with an 11.4-inch touchscreen, connected navigation, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, wireless device charging; Interactive Driver Display |
| Driver assistance | Traffic sign recognition, lane departure warning and rear parking aid as standard from the 2024 update | Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Keep Assist, Emergency Braking, Traffic Sign Recognition and Adaptive Speed Limiter, 3D Surround Camera and front and rear parking aids as standard; Blind Spot Assist, Rear Traffic Monitor and Head-up Display on higher trims |
More comparisons
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport
- Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
- Audi Q2 vs Peugeot Peugeot 2008
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Toyota RAV4 (2019)
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Volvo XC40
- BMW Z4 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
- Audi Q2 vs Volvo XC40
- Audi Q2 vs Toyota C-HR (2016)
- Audi Q2 vs Mazda MX-5

