BMW Z4 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| BMWZ4 | Land RoverRange Rover Evoque | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | October 2018 | November 2018 |
| Performance | ||
| Powertrain | Petrol | Mild hybrid, Plug-in hybrid |
| Power | 194–335 bhp (better) | 158–265 bhp |
| 0–62 mph | 4.5–6.6 s (better) | 7.2–10.3 s |
| Top speed | 149–155 mph (better) | 118–132 mph |
| Engine or motors | sDrive20i: 1,998 cc four-cylinder turbo petrol, 145 kW (197 hp); M40i: 2,998 cc six-cylinder turbo petrol, 250 kW (340 hp); bhp converted from BMW's kW figures | 1.5-litre three-cylinder petrol mild hybrid, 160 PS (P160); 2.0-litre four-cylinder diesel mild hybrid, 163 PS (D165) or 204 PS (D200); 1.5-litre petrol plug-in hybrid, 269 PS system output (P270e); bhp converted from Land Rover's PS figures. UK 0–60 mph: 9.7 s (P160), 9.2 s (D165), 7.9 s (D200), 6.8 s (P270e); 0–62 mph figures are from Land Rover Germany (the German plug-in hybrid is rated at 268 PS) |
| Torque | 320 Nm (sDrive20i), 500 Nm (M40i) | 260 Nm (P160), 380 Nm (D165), 430 Nm (D200), 540 Nm (P270e) |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic | 9-speed automatic |
| Drive | Rear-wheel drive | All-wheel drive; front-wheel drive with the P160 |
| Range and charging | ||
| Zero-emission range (WLTP) | – | 37.9 miles |
| Battery | – | 11.5 kWh |
| Fastest charging | – | 32 kW |
| Economy (WLTP) | 35.3–39.8 mpg | 36–196.4 mpg (better) |
| Range detail | – | P270e: WLTP electric range 37.9 miles combined, 46.6 miles city |
| Charging | – | P270e: 11.5 kWh usable battery; 0–80% in about 30 minutes at 32 kW DC (CCS); 0–100% in about 2 hours 12 minutes on a 7 kW AC charger |
| Efficiency | WLTP combined: 38.7–39.8 mpg (sDrive20i), 35.3 mpg (M40i) | WLTP combined: 34.9–36.0 mpg (P160), 42.6–44.6 mpg (D165), 41.4–44.6 mpg (D200), 196.4 mpg weighted and 182.9 Wh/km (P270e) |
| CO2 emissions | 161–164 g/km (sDrive20i), 180 g/km (M40i), WLTP combined | 32–184 g/km (WLTP combined) |
| Practicality | ||
| Body | Convertible | SUV |
| Seats | 2 | 5 (better) |
| Boot | 281 litres | 472 litres (better) |
| Length | 4,324 mm | 4,371 mm |
| Weight | – | From 1,717 kg |
| Width | 1,864 mm | – |
| Boot | 281 litres | 472 litres dry (591 litres wet) with the rear seats up; 1,156 litres dry (1,383 litres wet) with them folded; 40:20:40 split rear seat |
| Towing | – | Braked: 2,000 kg (D165, D200), 1,600 kg (P270e); not rated for towing (P160); 750 kg unbraked; 100 kg nose weight |
| Size | 4,324 mm long, 1,864 mm wide (2,024 mm with mirrors), 1,304 mm high; 2,470 mm wheelbase; EC unladen weight including a 75 kg driver is 1,525 kg (sDrive20i), 1,640 kg (M40i) | 4,371 mm long, 1,996 mm wide with mirrors folded (2,100 mm with mirrors out), 1,649 mm high; 2,681 mm wheelbase; 11.6 m turning circle (kerb to kerb); 212 mm ground clearance; 530 mm wading depth; P160 unladen weight is 1,717 kg DIN without a driver (1,792 kg EU with a driver) |
| Tech and safety | ||
| Infotainment | – | Pivi Pro with an 11.4-inch touchscreen, connected navigation, Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, wireless device charging; Interactive Driver Display |
| Driver assistance | – | Adaptive Cruise Control, Lane Keep Assist, Emergency Braking, Traffic Sign Recognition and Adaptive Speed Limiter, 3D Surround Camera and front and rear parking aids as standard; Blind Spot Assist, Rear Traffic Monitor and Head-up Display on higher trims |
More comparisons
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport
- Ford Kuga vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Toyota RAV4 (2019)
- BMW Z4 vs Toyota RAV4 (2019)
- Land Rover Range Rover Evoque vs Volvo XC40
- Audi Q2 vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
- BMW Z4 vs Mercedes-Benz A-Class Hatchback
- BMW Z4 vs Mazda MX-5

