Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP AG1-20
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| BeurerBM 25 | MicrolifeBP AG1-20 | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | – |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | No |
| AFib detection or ECG | – | No |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement during deflation; first on-sale date not established | Fully manual auscultatory upper-arm measurement using the supplied stethoscope and aneroid pressure gauge. Hand inflation and screw-controlled deflation, with readings interpreted by the operator. Actual first retail date unresolved |
| Accuracy | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this specification is distinct from clinical validation | March 2021 exact guide gives 0–300 mmHg range and 2 mmHg scale divisions. Static accuracy within ±3 mmHg at 18–33°C and ±6 mmHg at 34–46°C; hysteresis error 0–4 mmHg and air leakage under ±4 mmHg/min. Maker recommends an accuracy test every two years or after mechanical impact |
| Clinical validation | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the manual; exact independent registry confirmation was not established | Guide cites EN ISO 81060-1 and ANSI/AAMI SP09. These standards are separate from independent clinical validation; exact independent validation unresolved and headline omitted |
| Features | Single start/stop button, cuff fit check, irregular heartbeat warning, classification scale and automatic switch-off; maker lists no resting indicator or calculated averages | Mechanical dial, separate pump ball and adjustable deflation valve. No automatic pressure or pulse calculation, irregular-heartbeat screening, AFib detection or ECG |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–42 cm | 22–32 cm |
| Cuff | Supplied upper-arm cuff | Supplied soft M 22–32 cm cuff established by exact current guide and Asia-Pacific product page. Other regional bundles are not inferred from retailer variants |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Bluetooth and app | No | No |
| Memory | – | No electronic storage; readings, date and time recorded separately by the operator |
| App | Scan & Save in beurer HealthManager Pro uses a smartphone camera to record the display; no Bluetooth connection | No Bluetooth, USB or phone app |
| Power | Four 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries or optional DC 5 V, 1 A mains adaptor through USB-C; USB-C is for mains operation, not charging the disposable batteries | Mechanical operation without batteries or mains power |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Non-illuminated LCD, 4.4 × 5.3 cm, with black digits; maker lists no date/time display | Analogue manometer with pointer; no LCD |
| Size | 12.00 × 9.00 × 4.00 cm (L × W × H) | Product and support pages list 175 × 70 × 103 mm and 450 g. March 2021 exact guide instead lists 185 × 75 × 110 mm (±1 mm) and weight up to 540 g. Conditions and the reason for the discrepancy are not established |
| In the box | Monitor, 22–42 cm cuff and four AAA batteries | Current guide lists M cuff, pump ball, valve, stethoscope and soft bag; manometer identified in controls |
More comparisons
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 53
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AU941f
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AX356f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 25
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AG1
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AS1-2
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A1 Easy
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Basic
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Classic
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Easy
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3 PC
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3 Plus
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3L Comfort
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP AG1-10
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Microlife BP AG1-20

