Beurer BM 25 vs Omron M2 Essential
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| BeurerBM 25 | OmronM2 Essential | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | – |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Clinically validated | – | Yes |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| AFib detection or ECG | – | No |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement during deflation; first on-sale date not established | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement; HEM-7188-E, distinct from M2+ HEM-7188-LE and earlier M2 generations. First on-sale date not established |
| Accuracy | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this specification is distinct from clinical validation | Maker's pressure accuracy ±3 mmHg and pulse accuracy ±5% of displayed reading; systolic range 60–260 mmHg, diastolic 40–215 mmHg and pulse 40–180 beats/minute |
| Clinical validation | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the manual; exact independent registry confirmation was not established | Maker manual states an 85-subject clinical investigation under EN ISO 81060-2:2014 and compliance with 2019, A1:2020 and A2:2024; investigation excludes pregnant and pre-eclamptic patients and uses K5 for diastolic pressure. Blood pressure validation does not establish diagnostic accuracy of rhythm indicators |
| Features | Single start/stop button, cuff fit check, irregular heartbeat warning, classification scale and automatic switch-off; maker lists no resting indicator or calculated averages | Irregular-heartbeat, body-movement, cuff-wrap and high-blood-pressure indicators. No AFib detection, ECG recording or automatic averaging; the UK page's generic Upper Arm BPM & ECG category label does not describe an ECG capability on this model |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–42 cm | 22–32 cm |
| Cuff | Supplied upper-arm cuff | Included HEM-CR24 soft cuff, 22–32 cm arm circumference; approximately 146 × 466 mm, 610 mm tube and 110 g. Optional compatible cuffs cover other arm sizes; their range is not the included cuff's range |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Readings stored | – | 30 |
| Bluetooth and app | No | No |
| Memory | – | Up to 30 readings |
| App | Scan & Save in beurer HealthManager Pro uses a smartphone camera to record the display; no Bluetooth connection | No Bluetooth or OMRON connect support |
| Power | Four 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries or optional DC 5 V, 1 A mains adaptor through USB-C; USB-C is for mains operation, not charging the disposable batteries | Four AA batteries included, DC 6 V / 4 W; optional compatible AC adapter sold separately. Approximately 900 measurements with new alkaline batteries and the included cuff, depending on batteries and cuff |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Non-illuminated LCD, 4.4 × 5.3 cm, with black digits; maker lists no date/time display | Digital LCD; monitor IP21 |
| Size | 12.00 × 9.00 × 4.00 cm (L × W × H) | Manual gives approximately 98 × 79 × 138 mm (W × H × L), differing from the UK web table's 172 × 117 × 117 mm; approximately 260 g without batteries |
| In the box | Monitor, 22–42 cm cuff and four AAA batteries | Monitor, HEM-CR24 cuff, four AA batteries and instruction manuals 1/2; no storage case |
More comparisons
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 53
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AU941f
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AX356f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 25
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AG1
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AS1-2
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A1 Easy
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Basic
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Classic
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Easy
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3 PC
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3 Plus
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3L Comfort
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP AG1-10
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP AG1-20

