Beurer BM 25 vs Omron M3 Comfort
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| BeurerBM 25 | OmronM3 Comfort | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | – | – |
| Measuring | ||
| Type | Upper arm | Upper arm |
| Clinically validated | – | Yes |
| Irregular heartbeat detection | Yes | Yes |
| AFib detection or ECG | – | No |
| Method | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement during deflation; first on-sale date not established | Automatic oscillometric upper-arm measurement; HEM-7155-E, distinct from M3 HEM-7154-E and M3 Comfort AFib HEM-7196-FLE. First on-sale date not established |
| Accuracy | Maker manual specifies display accuracy of ±3 mmHg for systolic and diastolic pressure and ±5% of the displayed pulse value; this specification is distinct from clinical validation | Maker's pressure accuracy ±3 mmHg and pulse accuracy ±5% of displayed reading; systolic range 60–260 mmHg, diastolic 40–215 mmHg and pulse 40–180 beats/minute |
| Clinical validation | Beurer states clinical testing to ISO 81060-2 in the manual; exact independent registry confirmation was not established | STRIDE BP lists this exact model for adults, diabetes and pregnancy/preeclampsia through approved equivalence to BP760N HEM-7320-Z, rather than three published exact-model trials. Medaval separately notes that the equivalence assessment is unpublished and its MDR compliance cannot be verified; rhythm indicators do not establish diagnostic accuracy |
| Features | Single start/stop button, cuff fit check, irregular heartbeat warning, classification scale and automatic switch-off; maker lists no resting indicator or calculated averages | Irregular-heartbeat, movement, cuff-wrap and high-blood-pressure indicators. Manual supports an average of the latest two or three readings within ten minutes, despite web-table averaging and high-pressure indicators being marked absent. No automatic consecutive three-reading mode, AFib screening or ECG recording |
| Cuff | ||
| Cuff fits | 22–42 cm | 22–42 cm |
| Cuff | Supplied upper-arm cuff | Included HEM-FL31 Intelli Wrap cuff, 22–42 cm arm circumference; approximately 145 × 532 mm, 750 mm tube and 163 g |
| Connections and memory | ||
| Users | – | 2 |
| Readings stored | – | 60 per user |
| Bluetooth and app | No | No |
| Memory | – | Up to 60 readings per user for two users; guest measurements are not saved |
| App | Scan & Save in beurer HealthManager Pro uses a smartphone camera to record the display; no Bluetooth connection | No Bluetooth or OMRON connect support |
| Power | Four 1.5 V LR03 AAA batteries or optional DC 5 V, 1 A mains adaptor through USB-C; USB-C is for mains operation, not charging the disposable batteries | Four AA batteries included, DC 6 V / 4 W; optional AC adapter sold separately. Approximately 1000 measurements using new alkaline batteries |
| Design | ||
| Display details | Non-illuminated LCD, 4.4 × 5.3 cm, with black digits; maker lists no date/time display | Digital LCD; monitor IP20 |
| Size | 12.00 × 9.00 × 4.00 cm (L × W × H) | Approximately 105 × 85 × 152 mm (W × H × L); 337 g without batteries in the 2022 manual, versus 340 g on the web page and older manual |
| In the box | Monitor, 22–42 cm cuff and four AAA batteries | Monitor, HEM-FL31 cuff, four AA batteries, storage case and instruction manuals 1/2 |
More comparisons
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 85
- Beurer BM 25 vs Beurer BM 53
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AU941f
- Beurer BM 25 vs Rossmax AX356f
- A&D Medical UA-611 vs Beurer BM 25
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AG1
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP 3AS1-2
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A1 Easy
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Basic
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Classic
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A2 Easy
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3 PC
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3 Plus
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP A3L Comfort
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP AG1-10
- Beurer BM 25 vs Microlife BP AG1-20

