Toyota C-HR vs Toyota C-HR (2016)
Better figure, where one is clearly better
| ToyotaC-HR | ToyotaC-HR (2016) | |
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Released | October 2023 | October 2016 |
| Performance | ||
| Powertrain | Hybrid, Plug-in hybrid | Hybrid, Petrol |
| Power | 138–220 bhp (better) | 114–120 bhp |
| 0–62 mph | 7.4–10.2 s (better) | 10.9–11.4 s |
| Top speed | 106–112 mph | 105–118 mph (better) |
| Engine or motors | 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol hybrid, 138 bhp (140 DIN hp, 103 kW) system output; 2.0-litre four-cylinder plug-in hybrid, 220 bhp (223 DIN hp, 164 kW) system output | 1.8-litre four-cylinder petrol hybrid (engine 97 bhp, system 120 bhp/90 kW, nickel-metal hydride battery) or 1.2-litre four-cylinder turbo petrol (114 bhp/85 kW); launch line-up, before later updates |
| Torque | Engine 142 Nm (1.8) or 190 Nm (2.0); electric motor 185 Nm (1.8) or 208 Nm (2.0 PHEV) | 142 Nm engine and 163 Nm motor (hybrid), 185 Nm (1.2T) |
| Gearbox | e-CVT automatic | e-CVT (hybrid), 6-speed manual or CVT (1.2T) |
| Drive | Front-wheel drive | Front-wheel drive; all-wheel drive available with 1.2T CVT |
| Range and charging | ||
| Zero-emission range (WLTP) | 41 miles | – |
| Economy (WLTP) | 60.1–353.1 mpg | – |
| Range detail | Plug-in hybrid electric range up to 41 miles | – |
| Charging | Plug-in hybrid has a 13.6 kWh lithium-ion battery and a 6.6 kW on-board charger (0–100% in under 2 h 30 min on a wallbox with the optional three-phase cable) | – |
| Efficiency | WLTP combined: from 60.1 mpg (1.8 hybrid), from 353.1 mpg (plug-in hybrid) | NEDC combined: 72.4–74.3 mpg (hybrid), 47.1–47.9 mpg (1.2T FWD), 44.8 mpg (1.2T AWD); not comparable with WLTP |
| CO2 emissions | From 105 g/km (1.8 hybrid), from 19 g/km (plug-in hybrid) per Toyota's technical specification; the September 2026 price list gives 51–52 g/km for the plug-in hybrid | 86–87 g/km (hybrid), 134–136 g/km (1.2T FWD), 144 g/km (1.2T AWD), NEDC combined |
| Practicality | ||
| Body | Crossover | Crossover |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Boot | 388 litres (better) | 377 litres |
| Length | 4,362 mm | 4,360 mm |
| Width | 1,832 mm | 1,795 mm |
| Weight | From 1,430 kg | From 1,320 kg |
| Boot | 388 litres (hybrid) or 310 litres (plug-in hybrid) to the tonneau cover | 377 litres (VDA) |
| Towing | 725 kg braked or unbraked | 725 kg (hybrid); 1,300 kg braked (1.2T manual), 1,100 kg (1.2T CVT) |
| Size | 4,362 mm long, 1,832 mm wide, 1,564 mm high; 2,640 mm wheelbase; 5.5 m turning radius (tyre); kerb weight 1,430–1,490 kg (hybrid), 1,645–1,695 kg (plug-in hybrid); drag coefficient 0.318 | 4,360 mm long, 1,795 mm wide, 1,565 mm high; 2,640 mm wheelbase; kerb weight 1,380–1,420 kg (hybrid), 1,320–1,390 kg (1.2T FWD), 1,460 kg (1.2T AWD); drag coefficient 0.32 (FWD) |
| Tech and safety | ||
| Infotainment | Eight-inch Toyota Smart Connect or 12.3-inch Toyota Smart Connect+ touchscreen; seven-inch or 12.3-inch digital driver's display; wireless charging tray | – |
More comparisons
- Toyota C-HR vs Toyota C-HR+
- Toyota C-HR (2016) vs Toyota C-HR+
- Omoda Omoda 5 vs Toyota C-HR
- CUPRA Formentor vs Toyota C-HR
- Fiat Fiat 600 vs Toyota C-HR
- Peugeot Peugeot 408 vs Toyota C-HR
- Kia Niro vs Toyota C-HR
- Nissan Qashqai vs Toyota C-HR
- Ford Puma vs Toyota C-HR (2016)
- Nissan JUKE vs Toyota C-HR (2016)
- Audi Q2 vs Toyota C-HR (2016)

